Azure Functions vs. Oracle Cloud Functions

Azure Functions

Oracle Cloud Functions

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Functions	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Azure Functions enables users to execute event-driven serverless code functions with an end-to-end development experience.	N/A
Oracle Cloud Functions	Score 7.6 out of 10	N/A	Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Functions is a serverless, event-driven service that lets developers build, run, and scale applications without provisioning or managing any infrastructure. Users pay only for the resources used when the function is running. Functions integrate with other OCI services and Oracle SaaS applications. Based on an open framework, OCI Functions can be ported to other clouds or on-premises environments.	N/A

Pricing

Azure Functions

Oracle Cloud Functions

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure Functions	Oracle Cloud Functions
Free Trial
Yes	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure Functions	Oracle Cloud Functions
Considered Both Products	Azure Functions Verified User Anonymous Chose Azure Functions Azure is the company's platform of choice, so it was already the pattern I found when I started working with it. However, I find it better than Google Cloud Functions because it has better documentation, provides templates that are easy to use and deploy, and is better … Incentivized Helpful? Davide De Pretto Freelance Solution Architect Chose Azure Functions This is the most straightforward and easy-to-implement server less solution. App Service is great, but it's designed for websites, and it cannot scale automatically as easily as Azure Functions. Container Apps is a robust and scalable choice, but they need much more planning, … Incentivized Helpful?	Oracle Cloud Functions No answer on this topic

Features

Azure Functions

Oracle Cloud Functions

Access Control and Security

Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
	Azure Functions 10.0 Ratings 10% above category average	Oracle Cloud Functions - Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Reporting & Analytics

Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	Azure Functions 8.3 Ratings 14% above category average	Oracle Cloud Functions - Ratings
Dashboards	9.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Standard reports	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Custom reports	8.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Function as a Service (FaaS)

Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Product A and Product B
	Azure Functions 10.0 Ratings 10% above category average	Oracle Cloud Functions - Ratings
Programming Language Diversity	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Runtime API Authoring	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Function/Database Integration	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
DevOps Stack Integration	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Azure Functions	Oracle Cloud Functions
Small Businesses	AWS Lambda Score 8.2 out of 10	AWS Lambda Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.1 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.1 out of 10	Red Hat OpenShift Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure Functions	Oracle Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Functions	Oracle Cloud Functions
Likelihood to Recommend	They're great to embed logic and code in a medium-small, cloud-native application, but they can become quite limiting for complex, enterprise applications. Incentivized Davide De Pretto Freelance Solution Architect Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	They natively integrate with many triggers from other Azure services, like Blob Storage or Event Grid, which is super handy when creating cloud-native applications on Azure (data wrangling pipelines, business process automation, data ingestion for IoT, ...) They natively support many common languages and frameworks, which makes them easily approachable by teams with a diverse background They are cheap solutions for low-usage or "seasonal" applications that exhibits a recurring usage/non-usage pattern (batch processing, montly reports, ...) Incentivized Davide De Pretto Freelance Solution Architect Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Timing for creating new instances. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Usability	Sometimes the Azure dashboard can feel confusing at first, and it can be hard to understand where things are. But overall, it has good integrations, is trustworthy for running there without disruptions, is well-documented and easy to implement, especially for newbies on the team, and has nice automated deployment features. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Azure is the company's platform of choice, so it was already the pattern I found when I started working with it. However, I find it better than Google Cloud Functions because it has better documentation, provides templates that are easy to use and deploy, and is better structured, consolidating various services into a single application. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Delivered new features faster. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots