TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Machine Learning vs. IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding vs. Pytorch

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Machine Learning

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Machine Learning is and end-to-end data science and analytics solution that helps professional data scientists to prepare data, develop experiments, and deploy models in the cloud. It replaces the Azure Machine Learning Workbench.

    $0

    per month

    IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AIBM offers Watson Natural Language Understanding, an NLP application supplying interpretation of unstructured textual data and language concept models.N/A

    Pytorch

    Score9.4 out of 10
    N/APytorch is an open source machine learning (ML) framework boasting a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries that extend PyTorch and support development in computer vision, NLP and or that supports other ML goals.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Editions & Modules
    Studio Pricing - Free
    $0.00
    per month
    Production Web API - Dev/Test
    $0.00
    per month
    Studio Pricing - Standard
    $9.99
    per ML studio workspace/per month
    Production Web API - Standard S1
    $100.13
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S2
    $1000.06
    per month
    Production Web API - Standard S3
    $9999.98
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Detailsβ€”β€”β€”
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    6 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    5 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Small Businesses
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    TensorFlow
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud AI
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Machine LearningIBM Watson Natural Language UnderstandingPytorch
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    I would highly recommend Azure machine learning design for those with less access to high-end computing infrastructure, as using Azure saves a lot of time, money, and effort by providing a hustle-free platform that is easy to use and train your employees on. On the other hand, if you are looking for complete control of the machine learning model you create and would like to add detailed functionalities and try different algorithms, then Azure is less suitable here as it’s very high level.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    IBM Watson Natural Language Understanding is a Swiss Army knife that can be used in many scenarios. An extensive list of easy to use APIs is provided making it very easy to integrate it in any environment. The text analysis is decent and above market average. It generates results in many forms to suit may scenarios (important keywords, concepts, sentiment analysis, etc.).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    They have created Pytorch Lightening on top of Pytorch to make the life of Data Scientists easy so that they can use complex models they need with just a few lines of code, so it's becoming popular. As compared to TensorFlow(Keras), where we can create custom neural networks by just adding layers, it's slightly complicated in Pytorch.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Easy to create the experiment.
    • Easy to adopt the best algorithm.
    • Efficient way to deploy the model as a web service.
    • Centralized platform for the life cycle of machine learning goal.
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Easy to use and extensive APIs.
    • Decent accuracy.
    • It recognizes concepts and semantic roles.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • flexibility
    • Clean code, close to the algorithm.
    • Fast
    • Handles GPUs, multiple GPUs on a single machine, CPUs, and Mac.
    • Versatile, can work efficiently on text/audio/image/tabular datasets.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Few models: Even though it has a lot of Machine Learning models, it is quite limited when compared to R. Most Data Scientists still use and prefer R, so the newest models tend to release as R libraries. With Azure ML, we need to wait for Microsoft to evaluate and decide if including a new model is a good idea or not
    • Tableau interface: last time I checked there was no easy way to connect with Tableau.
    • Cloud based: You always need a good internet connection to use it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Improve Sentiment Analysis accuracy.
    • Prevent having conflicting results (sad and happy, etc.).
    • Foreign names detection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Since pythonic if developing an app with pytorch as backend the response can be substantially slow and support is less compares to Tensorflow
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Good UX/UI and overall good usability, but it takes a while to get used to the product & platform. The whole design seems fragmented with little in terms of integration with project management tools such as JIRA, or wireframing. Overall it feels like an unfinished product that's meant for teaching more than for production.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    The big advantage of PyTorch is how close it is to the algorithm. Oftentimes, it is easier to read Pytorch code than a given paper directly. I particularly like the object-oriented approach in model definition; it makes things very clean and easy to teach to software engineers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    I'm satisfied with the Azure Machine Learning Studio- it fulfilled my goal in a single channel. Even haven't worr[ied] about the maintenance or any fault tolerance. This provide[s] the user interactive UI to grab the features easily. [Their] support teams also very help[ful], they stand with us at any time.
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Not sure
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    It is easier to learn, it has a very cost effective license for use, it has native build and created for Azure cloud services, and that makes it perfect when compared against the alternatives. As a Microsoft tool, it has been built to contain many visual features and improved usability even for non-specialist users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Pytorch is very, very simple compared to TensorFlow. Simple to install, less dependency issues, and very small learning curve. TensorFlow is very much optimised for robust deployment but very complicated to train simple models and play around with the loss functions. It needs a lot of juggling around with the documentation. The research community also prefers PyTorch, so it becomes easy to find solutions to most of the problems. Keras is very simple and good for learning ML / DL. But when going deep into research or building some product that requires a lot of tweaks and experimentation, Keras is not suitable for that. May be good for proving some hypotheses but not good for rigorous experimentation with complex models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Reduce energy consumption caused by GPUs.
    • Saves on recycling and transporting costs and maintenance caused by buying high-end equipment.
    • Improve productivity as building products using Azure is easier than building everything up from scratch (e.g., machine learning and AI applications).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    IBM
    • Reduced development time.
    • Increased solution efficiency in understanding the user.
    • Increased solution scalability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • The ability to make models as never before
    • Being able to control the bias of models was not done before the arrival of Pytorch in our company
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots