Azure Pipelines

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Pipelines
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Users can automate builds and deployments with Azure Pipelines. Build, test, and deploy Node.js, Python, Java, PHP, Ruby, C/C++, .NET, Android, and iOS apps. Run in parallel on Linux, macOS, and Windows. Azure Pipelines can be purchased standalone, but it is also part of Azure DevOps Services agile development planning and CI/CD suite.N/A
Pricing
Azure Pipelines
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Pipelines
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Pipelines
Considered Both Products
Azure Pipelines
Chose Azure Pipelines
We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then …
Chose Azure Pipelines
The tools are very similar - but Azure Pipelines work best for Azure-based products are better suited for the stack. For our engineers, we could switch between all the various continuous integration/deployment tools without much issues, but it makes sense to use the stack …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Azure Pipelines
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Pipelines
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Pipelines
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is good tool if you are doing continuous improvements in your code and you wish it goes live whenever you push code to GitHub. So integrating Azure Pipeline, it automatically does CI/CD in the background once you push code/merge code and it is live in few minutes. It also does some automated tests if you have wrote scripts
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Integration with SonarQube
  • Integration with Azure DevOps
  • Integration with GitHub
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • The errors which we got sometimes are not clearly enough.
  • There are some let's say hidden options, they could be more visible
  • When the process is running we have to remember about manually refreshing to see the current status because it doesn't work automatically
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We have used the GitHub CI/CD. Earlier we were using the Azure Pipelines but after GitHub had their actions, we integrated that for CI/CD. It runs the tests and makes a production build which can be live. GitHub CI/CD is more useful because we have to make script only once then just by few changes we can deploy it onto Azure, AWS, Google anywhere so we found it more convenient
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • we have had outages from Azure in the past
Read full review
ScreenShots