Azure SignalR Service vs. Confluent

Confluent

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure SignalR Service	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Azure SignalR Service is a fully-managed service that allows developers to focus on building real-time web experiences without worrying about capacity provisioning, reliable connections, scaling, encryption or authentication. Through integration with the .NET SignalR library and Visual Studio family, the service makes it easier to deliver experiences such as chat, instant broadcasting, and IoT dashboards.	N/A
Confluent	Score 9.2 out of 10	N/A	Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.	$385 per month

Pricing

Azure SignalR Service

Confluent

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Basic: $0
Standard: Starting at ~$385
per month
Enterprise: Starting at ~$1,150
per month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure SignalR Service	Confluent
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Confluent monthly bills are based upon resource consumption, i.e., you are only charged for the resources you use when you actually use them: Stream: Kafka clusters are billed for eCKUs/CKUs ($/hour), networking ($/GB), and storage ($/GB-hour). Connect: Use of connectors is billed based on throughput ($/GB) and a task base price ($/task/hour). Process: Use of stream processing with Confluent Cloud for Apache Flink is calculated based on CFUs ($/minute). Govern: Use of Stream Governance is billed based on environment ($/hour). Confluent storage and throughput is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB). Please also note that all prices are stated in United States Dollars unless specifically stated otherwise. All billing computations are conducted in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure SignalR Service	Confluent

Features

Azure SignalR Service

Confluent

Streaming Analytics

Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	Azure SignalR Service - Ratings	Confluent 9.1 2 Ratings 13% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis	00 Ratings	10.02 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards	00 Ratings	8.02 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources	00 Ratings	10.02 Ratings
Low Latency	00 Ratings	9.02 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools	00 Ratings	8.02 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out	00 Ratings	9.02 Ratings
Data Enrichment	00 Ratings	10.01 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Azure SignalR Service	Confluent
Small Businesses	AWS IoT Core Score 9.9 out of 10	IBM Streams (discontinued) Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Apache Kafka Score 8.6 out of 10	Tealium Customer Data Hub Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Apache Kafka Score 8.6 out of 10	Spotfire Streaming Score 5.2 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure SignalR Service	Confluent
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure SignalR Service	Confluent
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent Products work great. Training is available. Customer support is good. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft No answers on this topic	Confluent It enables us to develop event driven application. It increases our ability to handle streaming data. It reduces latency of communication. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots