Azure Virtual Desktop vs. HPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Desktop
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Azure Virtual Desktops are a comprehensive desktop and app virtualization service running in the cloud.N/A
HPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
HPE’s portfolio includes a choice of traditional rack servers, hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solutions, composable solutions, and support for bare-metal VDI.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual DesktopHPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual DesktopHPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual DesktopHPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
Azure Virtual DesktopHPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(16 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual DesktopHPE Desktop Virtualization Solutions
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Currently Azure Virtual Desktop enviroments are our first choice for all customers. Especially because most of our customers already have a M365 License which includes Azure Virtual Desktop usage. We deploy it for both RemoteApp and Full desktop solutions. This gives us the flexibility to "lift and shift" a specific workload of more legacy customers towards the cloud and provide them with a secure solution to use their apps in the cloud from anywhere.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • Better computing power
  • Configurable System and as per team needs configuration can be added or removed at ease
  • Internet Connectivity within the cloud system is way better than our home / office internet connections
  • No heating issues on personal machines, leaving all the worry on actual data center machines
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cons
Microsoft
  • Use the Azure portal, Windows Virtual Desktop PowerShell and REST interfaces to configure the host pools, create app groups, assign users, and publish resources.
  • Publish full desktop or individual remote apps from a single host pool, create individual app groups for different sets of users, or even assign users to multiple app groups to reduce the number of images.
  • As we manage our environment, we use built-in delegated access to assign roles and collect diagnostics to understand various configuration or user errors.
  • We use the new Diagnostics service to troubleshoot errors.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I think that the cloud based [Azure] Windows Virtual Desktop is the future and sets the precedent for how these should be configured in the future. I've used cheap options and other more expensive options, but VD is the best when compared to Citrix or freeware. I would recommend it to anyone over these.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • More people can work from home which is a positive contribution to company’s objective of promoting work life balance
  • Reduced building operating costs with more staff working from home
  • At any point in time
  • Significantly reduced loss of data if a
  • user loses or damages a work laptop
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots