TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Virtual Desktop

Score8.4 out of 10

56 Reviews and Ratings

What is Azure Virtual Desktop?

Azure Virtual Desktops are a comprehensive desktop and app virtualization service running in the cloud.

Azure Virtual Desktop Use

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Azure Virtual Desktop has been the go-to remote desktop management solution in two of the organizations I have worked for. It was central in enabling remote work for us during the 2020-2022 period, and is still crucial as far as ensuring contributors work within a trust-agnostic environment and for ensuring compliance. The scale of use was significant in both cases (all remote & hybrid workers).

Pros

  • Lightweight
  • Easily scalable
  • Easy to set up
  • Intuitive

Cons

  • High latency in some cases
  • Cost
  • Unexpected disconnections

Return on Investment

  • Immediately reduced value drift
  • Reduced security incidents by 85%
  • Cut down tool access delay in half

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Citrix DaaS

Other Software Used

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Copilot

Highly Recommend Azure Virtual Desktop over Citrix

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Azure Virtual Desktop has been our replacement for Citrix XenDesktop. While we deploy laptops with VPN tunnels, we have always found the need to have some virtual desktop presence. It has its place in our DR Planning, as well as proving a valuable tool for temporary access during hardware issues. Although it is not heavily used, it can be scaled up to meet demands.

Pros

  • Provides excellent remote access method for non-firm hardware.
  • Since OS is multi-session windows 11, users receive a more familiar experience to their laptops.
  • Integrations such as FSLogix and Nerdio have led to a consentient user experience.

Cons

  • Logging and monitoring rely on Azure backends. A dedicated dashboard specific to AVD would be welcomed.
  • Learning curve upon initial deployment. Although I hear this is better now.
  • Some management and reporting tools are lacking. We supplement this with Nerdio.

Return on Investment

  • We already have M365 E3, so not having to purchase additional licensing helped cover our user pool.
  • Automatic scaling sets allow us to run what is actually needed, compared to having servers running constantly in our previous environment.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

XenServer

Other Software Used

Nerdio, Azure Data Factory, Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure Databricks, Azure Automation

Powerful and Flexible Virtual Desktop Platform with Some Usability Complexity

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Citrix Desktop license become costly and not reliable in our infrastructure. Primary used this to solve the secure remote access and terminal desktops for external users.

Pros

  • Security, The Azure Desktop and applications run on Azure DC so data and network doesn't leave the could env.
  • Big one for us is scalability and cost control, while we have some heavy users in seasonal pattern so we can turn off and on VMs as it progress
  • Management overall is user friendly and easy to manage.
  • It's on cloud so local outage doesn't impact users.

Cons

  • Troubleshooting bit limited as it's running on MS cloud. You don't have that level of access to get the logs data.
  • App or ISO update management also complex compare to user management. It also hard to predict cost when you have inflex of usage. not really straightforward to tell which group/users are using most of the resources.
  • as I mention earlier, troubleshooting is limited. When you have peak hour usage, user may see some performance issues.

Return on Investment

  • Generally, Positive so far. From business objectives, we covered security, scalability and efficiency but implementing AVD.
  • User are able to work securely from anywhere and support hybrid model as well.
  • however, ongoing attention require to make sure you are not over sizing the host pools and cost remain in expected budget.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Citrix Gateway and Citrix Secure Private Access

Azure AVD good choice for moving virtual desktop to the cloud

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We leverage AVD for all non-persistent desktops, this allows us to follow our cloud first strategy, this is leveraged in US-East region and support users globally.

Pros

  • easy setup
  • multiple configuration options
  • minimal latency

Cons

  • Capacity issues in specific regions
  • Cost between different cpu options
  • can be buggy at times

Return on Investment

  • AVD has allowed us to move additional applications to the cloud
  • AVD supports our organization globally running out of US-East
  • AVD has a better ROI now that Broadcom has changed pricing model to per core.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Azure VMware Solution and Amazon WorkSpaces

Other Software Used

Rubrik, AWS Backup, Azure AI Document Intelligence, AWS Storage Gateway

Best in market to save cost of windows license for common applications

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using Azure Virtual Desktop or AVD on large scale as a Common Shared desktop to showcase our test builds to end users. as we have a large team, we used separate instances for all builds. Azure Virtual Desktop played a vital role in removing this bottleneck. now we use a single AVD desktop for all the testing.

Pros

  • scaling
  • using our own image
  • seamless multi-session capabilities

Cons

  • UI can be updated
  • Higher DPI would have been welcome
  • lags on low end devices

Most Important Features

  • scalability
  • cost
  • ease of use

Return on Investment

  • saved a lot by removing individual instances
  • we can use one license for one system and essentially share it with as much staff as we want
  • we saved a lot on Microsoft products

Alternatives Considered

Remote Desktop Services and VNC Connect

Other Software Used

Remote Desktop Services, VNC Connect, AnyDesk