Azure Virtual Desktop vs. OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Desktop
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Azure Virtual Desktops are a comprehensive desktop and app virtualization service running in the cloud.N/A
Micro Focus Desktop Containers
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Formerly Micro Focus Desktop Containers or Novell Application Virtualization, OpenText Hybrid Workspaces gives remote workers access to apps and data. They can leverage any device for secure access to applications and data whether remote or on-site.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual DesktopMicro Focus Desktop Containers
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Considered Both Products
Azure Virtual Desktop
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
No real competition, Azure Virtual Desktop has a lot fewer problems and is much more usable than Citrix DaaS in my experience. I found my time with Citrix DaaS quite unsettling and issues were flagged daily. I would select Azure Virtual Desktop any day and likely stick to it if …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
Licensing is much more cost effective as our users are not regularly using remote access. Having to purchase user cal's "just in case" was expensive. Citrix over the last few years has become more difficult with licensing and support. We were glad to move away. As our users …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
As I've mentioned before, The license cost for Citrix is higher atm. Plus, hosting and infrastructure also added up in up front cost. With AVD Plus enterprise licensing, we are just paying what we are using withing Azure network. It's not complete solution but it's best if you …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
functionality & pricing.
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
For us Parallels RAS is still more a "onpremise" solution, with Azure Virtual Desktop we can really leverage the power of the cloud.
We can spin up additional hosts if the load is too high and spin down hosts in the night to cut costs. Not being bound to onpremise hardware makes …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
The most important reason to select the Azure Virtual Desktop solution for our client was the cloud infrastructure. We had already switched the Azure Active Directory with many other Servers as Virtual Machines in the Azure platform as well as total Office 365 implementation. …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
This is primary virtualization tool I have used. Have experience with VMWare suite and this has similar features and ease of use. Pricing was slightly lower and one of the factors. We also use Azure for our M365 deployment and was a easier carry over to stay in the Microsoft …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
The above-mentioned are only single-purpose software and no doubt they do the job but, AVD itself is a whole suit of services. easy use of UI makes it a greater choice among others. the best thing about AVD is the ability to let multiple users connect rather than one instance …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
We also tested Nutanix Frame and VMware Horizon Cloud, but it turned out that using Nerdio together with Azure Virtual Desktop is the best combination that is saving us a lot of time (for setup, configuration, and management), but also with this combination we are also saving a …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
I have not used any other services similar to Azure Virtual Desktop. I have only seen demos and videos but have not tried them or tried implementing them into our environment at the office. I know there are plenty of options available but security is our biggest concern to us
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
We moved most of our workflow to Microsoft Azure and it is wise to choose AVD and It very well suits for virtual environment requirements and application access.
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
It is better manageability of the resources to reduce the cost. Easy to configure the virtual desktop and access anywhere at any time. Autoscale up the VM on high demands time and then reduce it automatically. Azure Virtual Desktop provides the best security to our application …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
All exploring options for virtual desktops, Azure Windows Virtual Desktop, has a significant advantage with ease of use as most users are familiar with the windows operating system. This makes it possible for any user to do their best work, and with Azure Windows Virtual …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
I think that the cloud based [Azure] Windows Virtual Desktop is the future and sets the precedent for how these should be configured in the future. I've used cheap options and other more expensive options, but VD is the best when compared to Citrix or freeware. I would …
Chose Azure Virtual Desktop
Azure lab services is excellent for small scale classes but once you reach a particular density or need to serve entire school or district level resources you need to move into WVD.
Micro Focus Desktop Containers
Chose Micro Focus Desktop Containers
We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization.
Features
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Application Virtualization
Comparison of Application Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Virtual Desktop
-
Ratings
OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Application support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Device support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Ease of deployment00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Application packaging00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Security00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Parallels Desktop for Mac
Parallels Desktop for Mac
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 7.9 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
Currently Azure Virtual Desktop enviroments are our first choice for all customers. Especially because most of our customers already have a M365 License which includes Azure Virtual Desktop usage. We deploy it for both RemoteApp and Full desktop solutions. This gives us the flexibility to "lift and shift" a specific workload of more legacy customers towards the cloud and provide them with a secure solution to use their apps in the cloud from anywhere.
Read full review
It is very well suited to large, diverse organizations looking to quickly deploy applications virtually to its employee base. They give immense control to system
Admins and allow users to more easily install the applications they need. They also allow users quick access to their applications, even during migration.
Read full review
Pros
  • You can publish as many host pools as you need to accommodate your diverse workloads
  • Brings your own image for production workloads or test from the Azure Gallery
  • Reduces costs with pooled, multi-session resources.
  • With the new Windows 10 Enterprise multi-session capability exclusive to Windows Virtual Desktop and Remote Desktop Session Host (RDSH) role on Windows Server, you can greatly reduce the number of virtual machines and operating system (OS) overhead while still providing the same resources to your users.
Read full review
  • It allowed us to isolate applications so that they did not adversely interact with other applications.
  • They served as a virtual machine while we managed the migration to a new OS.
  • They helped us decrease malicious attacks because web browsers operating within a container could be terminated if an attack occurred.
  • They allowed us to quickly deploy applications across a diverse, global organization.
Read full review
Cons
  • Troubleshooting bit limited as it's running on MS cloud. You don't have that level of access to get the logs data.
  • App or ISO update management also complex compare to user management. It also hard to predict cost when you have inflex of usage. not really straightforward to tell which group/users are using most of the resources.
  • as I mention earlier, troubleshooting is limited. When you have peak hour usage, user may see some performance issues.
Read full review
  • Container access and restrictions were a bit cumbersome to set up.
  • We would frequently have users report containers failing to work properly due to file size.
  • There was very little documentation we could provide to users during onboarding
Read full review
Usability
Stability and latency complaints are common, but not experienced by all users. A drop in overall productivity can be seen in contributors who rely on a lot of copy-pasting for editing, so some such commands are not instantaneous. Set up is intuitive and the tool is simple enough. It was quick to adopt and stick to.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Licensing is much more cost effective as our users are not regularly using remote access. Having to purchase user cal's "just in case" was expensive. Citrix over the last few years has become more difficult with licensing and support. We were glad to move away. As our users use Azure Virtual Desktop as a fallback, it proved to be a much more cost effective solution, and FSLogix and W11 provide a better end user experience.
Read full review
We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Though this virtual desktop had its cost but it is better in the longer run as we dont need to upgrade our not much older machines
  • Only concern is we need to make sure that we provide better internet connection at all time
  • The productivity has gone up multifold since previously we used to struggle with our older machines capacity to process data
Read full review
  • We were able to migrate to a different OS 50% more quickly than in the past.
  • We saw a dramatic decrease in malicious attacks while using this product.
  • Our users were able to more quickly get access to the products they needed.
  • We no longer needed to worry about applications not playing nice with others since they were isolated
Read full review
ScreenShots