Azure Virtual Desktop vs. OpenText Hybrid Workspaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Virtual Desktop
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Azure Virtual Desktops are a comprehensive desktop and app virtualization service running in the cloud.N/A
Micro Focus Desktop Containers
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Formerly Micro Focus Desktop Containers or Novell Application Virtualization, OpenText Hybrid Workspaces gives remote workers access to apps and data. They can leverage any device for secure access to applications and data whether remote or on-site.N/A
Pricing
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual DesktopMicro Focus Desktop Containers
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Features
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Application Virtualization
Comparison of Application Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Azure Virtual Desktop
-
Ratings
OpenText Hybrid Workspaces
7.4
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Application support00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Device support00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Ease of deployment00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Application packaging00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Security00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Parallels RAS
Parallels RAS
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 7.1 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Omnissa Horizon
Omnissa Horizon
Score 7.1 out of 10
Nutanix AHV
Nutanix AHV
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
7.2
(17 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Virtual DesktopOpenText Hybrid Workspaces
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Currently Azure Virtual Desktop enviroments are our first choice for all customers. Especially because most of our customers already have a M365 License which includes Azure Virtual Desktop usage. We deploy it for both RemoteApp and Full desktop solutions. This gives us the flexibility to "lift and shift" a specific workload of more legacy customers towards the cloud and provide them with a secure solution to use their apps in the cloud from anywhere.
Read full review
OpenText
It is very well suited to large, diverse organizations looking to quickly deploy applications virtually to its employee base. They give immense control to system
Admins and allow users to more easily install the applications they need. They also allow users quick access to their applications, even during migration.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Better computing power
  • Configurable System and as per team needs configuration can be added or removed at ease
  • Internet Connectivity within the cloud system is way better than our home / office internet connections
  • No heating issues on personal machines, leaving all the worry on actual data center machines
Read full review
OpenText
  • It allowed us to isolate applications so that they did not adversely interact with other applications.
  • They served as a virtual machine while we managed the migration to a new OS.
  • They helped us decrease malicious attacks because web browsers operating within a container could be terminated if an attack occurred.
  • They allowed us to quickly deploy applications across a diverse, global organization.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Use the Azure portal, Windows Virtual Desktop PowerShell and REST interfaces to configure the host pools, create app groups, assign users, and publish resources.
  • Publish full desktop or individual remote apps from a single host pool, create individual app groups for different sets of users, or even assign users to multiple app groups to reduce the number of images.
  • As we manage our environment, we use built-in delegated access to assign roles and collect diagnostics to understand various configuration or user errors.
  • We use the new Diagnostics service to troubleshoot errors.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Container access and restrictions were a bit cumbersome to set up.
  • We would frequently have users report containers failing to work properly due to file size.
  • There was very little documentation we could provide to users during onboarding
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
AVD has performed well for us and allowed us to migrate away from Citrix.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I think that the cloud based [Azure] Windows Virtual Desktop is the future and sets the precedent for how these should be configured in the future. I've used cheap options and other more expensive options, but VD is the best when compared to Citrix or freeware. I would recommend it to anyone over these.
Read full review
OpenText
We went with Desktop Containers because we had a former colleague recommend it. However, we do feel we made the right choice for our organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • More people can work from home which is a positive contribution to company’s objective of promoting work life balance
  • Reduced building operating costs with more staff working from home
  • At any point in time
  • Significantly reduced loss of data if a
  • user loses or damages a work laptop
Read full review
OpenText
  • We were able to migrate to a different OS 50% more quickly than in the past.
  • We saw a dramatic decrease in malicious attacks while using this product.
  • Our users were able to more quickly get access to the products they needed.
  • We no longer needed to worry about applications not playing nice with others since they were isolated
Read full review
ScreenShots