Azure Virtual Network vs. Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

Azure Virtual Network

Azure Virtual Network

9 Reviews and Ratings

Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

12 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Azure Virtual Network	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft's Azure Virtual Network allows the user to gain granular control over network traffic, build a hybrid infrastructure, and create secure, isolated network topographies to run virtual machines and applications.	N/A
Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)	Score 8.5 out of 10	N/A	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud has a network of 27 regions and 200+ countries and territories, boasting little to no downtime for its users. It is automatically configured or can be done by the user and allows you to bring your own IP addresses to reduce downtime caused by migration.	$0 per ingress traffic

Pricing

Azure Virtual Network

Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

egress traffic: $0 - 0.15
per GB
ingress traffic: $0
based on services that process ingress traffic: Load Balancers, Cloud NAT, Protocol forwarding.
Premium Tier (egress rates): $0- $0.23
per month per GB of data delivered
Standard Tier (egress rates): $0.045, $0.065, $0.085
per month per GB of data delivered: 150-500TB, 10-150TB, 0-10TB

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Azure Virtual Network	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Azure Virtual Network	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Considered Both Products	Azure Virtual Network No answer on this topic	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Yash Trivedi Software Engineer III Chose Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Google VPC and networking infrastructure is very matured and is built later after Amazon VPC. It made sure to address all the limitations faced by amazon VPC. Google Virtual private cloud is across regions while amazon VPC covers only one region but multiple zones. Google VPC … Incentivized Helpful?
Top Pros	Pro Security rules	Pro Well documented Pro Setting up Pro Peer to peer
Top Cons	No answers on this topic	Minus Google cloud Minus User friendly Minus Needs to work

Best Alternatives
	Azure Virtual Network	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Small Businesses	Vultr Score 6.2 out of 10	Vultr Score 6.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
Enterprises	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Azure Virtual Network	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (1 ratings)	8.4 (8 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Azure Virtual Network	Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)
Likelihood to Recommend	Microsoft For SAAS it's not required but for most of IAAS and PAAS components Virtual network are required the deployment of storage account doesn't require virtual network . Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Google An effective pricing strategy is in place. Google Cloud VPC is the most secure since it runs on a private network and never contacts the public network. Google is well-known for its AI/ML and Kubernetes engines, both of which have a leg up on the competition. Google Cloud VPC's database services are yet to be improved. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	Microsoft Allows connectivity within Vnet Secure Communication can be established Security Rules can be enforced Routing Can be Established Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Google Can utilize one VPC to connect many regions without using the internet. Unlike competitors, VPC can automatically build a virtual topology. Configure private communication inside companies. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Microsoft Integration of Express Routes needs to be simplified Endpoints Security has to be available in Vnet itself Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Google Sometimes the group settings tab lags a little Although overall it's easy to use, some of the sections lack documentation Routes section is very poorly implemented, requires a lot of digging to learn how to use Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Microsoft During Initial Phase itself on cloud Journey Azure Services was opted for there was no comparison done Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Google Google VPC and networking infrastructure is very matured and is built later after Amazon VPC. It made sure to address all the limitations faced by amazon VPC. Google Virtual private cloud is across regions while amazon VPC covers only one region but multiple zones. Google VPC is a global resource while AWS is a regional resource. Incentivized Yash Trivedi Software Engineer III Read full review
Return on Investment	Microsoft Deployment of Gateway needs to be faster as it takes a lot of time which is negative Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Google Using Google Cloud VPC cloud storage has saved us on infra budget and per TB storage cost Using MySQL databases on Google Cloud VPC has improved the performance and cost of operation and maintenance Better pricing model has improvement on operational cost and increased revenue Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots		Google Cloud Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) Screenshots