TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Virtual WAN vs. HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Virtual WAN

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Virtual WAN connects global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. With it the user can plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections.N/A

    HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AThe HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN platform addresses the challenges associated with backhauling cloud-destined traffic to the data center, thereby reducing the cost of bandwidth connectivity from the data center to cloud providers.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Virtual WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Virtual WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Virtual WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Virtual WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Virtual WANHPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    The HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN excel in environments where you do a lot of your East - West segmentation is done by another device. While these devices can do basic firewall functions, it's their not true intent. If you can group what you want your traffic to do into a few basic groups, this product will work great (think all Guest Traffic gets low priority and sent directly to the internet, VoIP gets sent directly out but high priority, and most internal traffic gets medium throughput). There are ways to really tinker reach the desired goals but this can be a double-edged sword of those configurations being forgotten about. There is also the use of templating which if you have a larger environment, this product will make some normal configs (think SNMP) more streamlined. The units are also highly reliable, built with HA in mind - our company has only experienced a single version that had a memory leak that we just needed to remember to reboot every 90 days while we waited for the next update (which came in like 4 months).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
    • Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
    • Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Fairly easy to manage once its setup and running
    • Updates are easy and handled with little downtime
    • Price is just right for the product functionality
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
    • If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Ran into some weird bugs along the way that required support to address
    • Not having physical devices that you can reboot yourself takes a bit of control away
    • Administrators have a bit of a learning curve in figuring out the new system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    The product and its management as a whole are worth investigating for any kind of people interested in looking at new SD-WAN appliances. The devices possess a lot of capability for granularity which makes them much more advanced than other products I've worked with in the past. Ironically, for all the granularity though, this product is held back that you can ultimately only have 7 different policies for routing decisions. We've ran into instances where we wanted two sites to only share certain routes between each other (through the use of tags which are basically an arbitrary way to say this traffic is special) but then we had to collapse some of our routing decisions in order to make a specific route table for these two to be able which felt like a step back in the advanced routing decisions we had previously made
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Prisma SD-WAN is a very simple solution to configure and maintain (so much to the point that in that environment, I questioned if my skills as a Network Engineer were needed). However it worked almost primarily on its own with very little input, by default and at the time of review had no way to do fully mesh (which was desired), and constantly suffered from memory leak. Its integrations were through the use of obscure tags and suffered from a "when it works - it works but when it doesn't - it doesn't and you don't know why" mentality. In contrast, HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN gives you a lot of insight into what is going on with the site, the integrations are done easily within Orchestrator (the control plane), and ultimately the product is typically a very stable product with many ways to configure and tweak the solution to fit your business needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
    • We are able unify all our operational activities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • It has created a bit of overhead as another control panel that needs to be managed
    • Recovery of invested costs will take some time
    • Time is saved on the separate management of sites
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots