TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Azure Virtual WAN vs. Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Azure Virtual WAN

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft's Azure Virtual WAN connects global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. With it the user can plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections.N/A

    Ipanema SD-WAN (discontinued)

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFrench company Ipanema was acquired in April 2015 by InfoVista, to expand that company's offerings into WAN optimization and became part of Extreme Networks portfolio, after the acquistion in late 2021. But the product line is discontinued, and no longer supported or sold.N/A
    Pricing
    Azure Virtual WANIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Azure Virtual WANIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Azure Virtual WANIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Azure Virtual WANIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Azure Virtual WANIpanema SD-WAN (discontinued)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Ipanema WAN Optimization solution is best suited for organizations where poor application performance and application visibility are the key challenges. It is effective where most of the customer sites are in areas where bandwidth upgrade is a challenge. Centralised management of devices through Web Server makes it easy to manage & control them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
    • Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
    • Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Dynamic WAN selection.
    • Application monitoring.
    • WAN optimization.
    • Application performance management.
    • Performance improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
    • If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • SaaS Applications.
    • Knowledge base on support portal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Discontinued Products
    Some of the problem areas where I feel it wasn't easy enough like troubleshooting, digging deep with packet inspection, security. But Dynamic WAN Selection based on the AQS parameters give this solution an advantage on the other products. Newly added features like cloud application performance monitoring is simplified now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Customer went through multiple vendors to address their issue related to application performance and WAN performance improvement. We went into discussion with Riverbed and Ipanema. Ipanema WAN Optimization solution fulfilled their requirements as some of the features like teleengine, virtual ipbox extra are an advantage over the Riverbed solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
    • We are able unify all our operational activities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • This can improve end user experience, which leads to reduced operational cost.
    • Return on Investment in 24 months.
    • Centralised management of devices can ease in management of devices.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots