B2Win Suite vs. SutiHR

It suited well to work on projects with team members that worked remotely. Especially bigger, more time-consuming projects and the ones with higher visual expectations have had great success with this suite. We used it in teams and had a good workflow going with it so far and would recommend it.

Incentivized

We implemented SutiHR as our first HR system. This choice was based on flexibility, ease of use, functionality and, of course, the equality of our data. While it doesn't offer a compelling interface like other products we've demonstrated, SutiHR has an all-in-one solution from new hire to termination, with room for customization.

Incentivized

• Presentation.
• Data Transfer.
• Easy to use.
• Good to teamwork.

Incentivized

• I like that this show isn't just about human resources.
• I like the design and it's simple enough to refer to how it works.

Incentivized

• More functions.
• Speed.
• Server issues.

Incentivized

• I wish it had an easier use of time sheets. It is not feasible to use without having to have a specific time set.

Incentivized

B2Win has had some benefits, better visual aspects and the data transfer was great and easy. Our team has learned to use it very quickly and had no issues using it. Other platforms, such as Google Workspace have a better reputation, more users and their development are faster because of a higher budget. That being said down the road we might switch over to Google again unless B2Win can stay competitive

Incentivized

• Improved quality of work.
• Easy way to change formats.
• Faster way to get work done.

Incentivized

• In my personal opinion, we feel that this product is one of the best as it is quite useful and we feel that it is quite useful and has no flaws.

Incentivized