Bioclinica ICL vs. ClinPlus CTMS

BioClinica ICL is well suited for meeting the requirements for regulatory filling and submission support, imagining collection and QC, centralized independent review for consistency purposes, site training and imagining archiving and sharing. The Bioclinica team also assist you with creating the database based on the protocol and study design. Bioclinical ICL has all the features to meet the requirements for medical imagining but they can ensure that their interface is more intuitive and easy to use.

Incentivized

The platform can be used for new biotechs who are just starting to implement clinical research platforms or for companies who are looking for new systems. ClinPlus has all other systems too such as EDC, IWRS, and eTMF so a company can use one platform for all the systems. ClinPlus Clinical Trial Management System is cloud-based so it is useful for end users to access the system without logging into a company server.

Incentivized

• The system is very easy to use by the end user. Uploading of images by the site is a very streamlined process
• BioClinica has the capability to centrally read the CT scan images by their own internal radiologist for consistency purposes
• BioClinica has a very good customer service and helpline

Incentivized

• Clin Plus CTMS can be integrated with Clin Plus EDC, eTMF, and IWRS system. It also has the ability to seamlessly integrate with other platforms
• Their monitoring functionalities are very useful such as site visit report authorizing and review workflow, email notification to CRAs and Project Managers for creating and reviewing trip reports.
• Study Finance Management tool is also a good feature to keep track of all your site budgets in one platform

Incentivized

• Report generating should be more robust and up to date. Clinical trial sites receive multiple queries for the same images even after the sites have responded to the same query.
• The webiste to upload images by the site is good but I have used other similar software which is more intuitive and easy to maneuver.

Incentivized

• It takes a while to get used to the platform especially if you are used to other CTMS platforms
• The system needs to be more intuitive for users to acknowledge all the features available

Incentivized

Parexel also has the capability to collect medical images in a central repository database. Parexel's uploading website is very intuitive and very easy to use. BioClinica can easily ensure that their uploading website is more user-friendly and the interface is easy to understand. Overall Bioclinica ICL is a very good option for pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.

Incentivized

I still prefer using Medidta CTMS as the platform is laid out in a very intuitive way and it is also very easy to integrate all the data into other platforms. With Clin Plus CTMS the system is good but to utilize it to its full potential all the other platforms provided by Clin Plus needs to be purchased also

Incentivized

• BioClinica ICL was able to meet our protocol and study design to create a central repository of all the images collected by the sites
• It ensured timely filling of study data to regulatory by ensuring the images data are submitted to regulatory authority as supporting documents
• It ensured that sites were able to upload imagining documents without extra burden on them

Incentivized

• The system allows project managers to easily keep track of study metrics in real time which is useful for making decisions
• The monitoring tools ensure that the trip reports are completed and reviewed in a timely manner

Incentivized