Bioclinica ICL vs. Saama

BioClinica ICL is well suited for meeting the requirements for regulatory filling and submission support, imagining collection and QC, centralized independent review for consistency purposes, site training and imagining archiving and sharing. The Bioclinica team also assist you with creating the database based on the protocol and study design. Bioclinical ICL has all the features to meet the requirements for medical imagining but they can ensure that their interface is more intuitive and easy to use.

Incentivized

• The system is very easy to use by the end user. Uploading of images by the site is a very streamlined process
• BioClinica has the capability to centrally read the CT scan images by their own internal radiologist for consistency purposes
• BioClinica has a very good customer service and helpline

Incentivized

• Report generating should be more robust and up to date. Clinical trial sites receive multiple queries for the same images even after the sites have responded to the same query.
• The webiste to upload images by the site is good but I have used other similar software which is more intuitive and easy to maneuver.

Incentivized

Parexel also has the capability to collect medical images in a central repository database. Parexel's uploading website is very intuitive and very easy to use. BioClinica can easily ensure that their uploading website is more user-friendly and the interface is easy to understand. Overall Bioclinica ICL is a very good option for pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies.

Incentivized

• BioClinica ICL was able to meet our protocol and study design to create a central repository of all the images collected by the sites
• It ensured timely filling of study data to regulatory by ensuring the images data are submitted to regulatory authority as supporting documents
• It ensured that sites were able to upload imagining documents without extra burden on them

Incentivized