BitLocker Drive Encryption vs. Sophos Central Device Encryption vs. VMware Cloud Foundation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BitLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's BitLocker is an endpoint encryption option.
$100
One Time Fee
Sophos Central Device Encryption
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Sophos Central Device Encryption (formerly SafeGuard) is a full disk encryption solution, based on the technology acquired with Utimaco by Sophos in 2008. It provides full disk encryption for Windows and macOS, and enables users to confidentially share sensitive files. A password protected HTML wrapper ensures only recipients with the correct password can access a document.N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware Cloud Foundation is a hybrid cloud platform for managing VMs and orchestrating containers, built on full-stack hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) technology. With a single architecture that is desribed by the vendor as easy to deploy, VMware Cloud Foundation aims to enable consistent, secure infrastructure and operations across private and public cloud.N/A
Pricing
BitLocker Drive EncryptionSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Editions & Modules
Windows 10 Home
$100.00
One Time Fee
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitLockerSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitLocker Drive EncryptionSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Considered Multiple Products
BitLocker
Chose BitLocker Drive Encryption
BitLocker Drive Encryption solution offering is cheaper than the one that McAfee offers, it will help you with specific business concerns like "how many encrypted assets do I have?" it's easy to maintain, easy to deploy, and easy to track. It's best suited for companies that …
Sophos Central Device Encryption
VMware Cloud Foundation

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
BitLocker Drive EncryptionSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Small Businesses
Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone
Score 8.1 out of 10
Bitdefender GravityZone
Bitdefender GravityZone
Score 8.1 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Symantec Encryption
Symantec Encryption
Score 9.9 out of 10
Symantec Encryption
Symantec Encryption
Score 9.9 out of 10
StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Score 8.2 out of 10
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Trellix Complete Data Protection
Score 8.2 out of 10
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BitLocker Drive EncryptionSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(11 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitLocker Drive EncryptionSophos Central Device EncryptionVMware Cloud Foundation
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is well suited especially for users that access or store sensitive/confidential data on their computers. In the case of where users are accessing confidential data over the network, it is highly recommended to use Bitlocker to encrypt the computer. In the case where users are storing confidential data on their computer, it should be a requirement that BitLocker is used/enabled. It would be less appropriate if someone was using a computer and they were not dealing with any sensitive data, or in cases where the computer is used for recreational purposes (browsing the web, playing games, etc).
Read full review
Sophos
It is mid-level when it comes to running it by a non-IT person. I have no technical/IT training and can figure out on my own (or with a little web search) how to do most tasks. It may not be best for the very tech-challenged operator.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
It is best suited for an on-premise cloud solution where customer can shift their entire production environment. Also, the customer has a preference for a Homogenous Infrastructure Environment where budget is not a challenge. It is not at all suited for a Heterogenous Environment, e.g., a Public cloud where integration becomes a huge issue, also in SMB sections where budget is challenging.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Encrypts the entire drive and provides a high level of security.
  • In an Active Directory environment, you can set up BitLocker to automatically save keys to AD.
  • As part of Windows, no additional licensing costs.
  • Set up and configuration is relatively easy.
  • Uses TPM module to increase security.
Read full review
Sophos
  • Centralised portal for both Anti Virus and Encryption
  • Internet-facing with the ability for global / multi region access for large organizations
  • Multi-level, built-in admin roles for different access levels for your Support Team. Also, you can define new roles to tailor to your organization
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Cloud enabled Solution.
  • Support Container based Apps.
  • Cost efficient.
  • Supports both Public and Private Environments.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Even if it's the best we tested, I think write performance could be improved. Maybe with dedicated hardware inside the TPM?
  • No integration with OS password is a shame as most others have it and it is Microsoft on Microsoft so they can probably do it better then anyone else and safer.
  • I wish they would support multiple passwords like FileVault on macOS. If it's a shared computer, you have to give the only password to Bitlocker to both users.
Read full review
Sophos
  • Interface is a little difficult to get Hands On. It can be simplified for better adaptability
  • XDR compatibility should be enhanced
  • More simplified white-books should be provided to train the non tech teams
  • Commercially also the cost should be improved for different industry segments
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • The Deployment is complex.
  • Recommended Number of Physical Nodes is three or more; with less than 3 Nodes, it becomes difficult to install V-SAN.
  • Need for better integration. If we go on the public cloud, it is a huge challenge while integrate with an open source platform.
  • Cost can be marginally reduced. SMB segments still prefer a separate license instead of VCF, or they postpone their purchase plans.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Sophos
Solution is easy to use and administer
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Very easy to enable.
Read full review
Sophos
I am pretty satisfied with Sophos Central Device Encryption's overall capabilities. It is easy to implement and ultimately brings more peace of mind because fewer tickets are generated. As a result, security within the organization is also improved. Another significant advantage is that you can quickly see the statuses in real time on the dashboards. This gives you a better overview and reduces the chance of missing minor security settings.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
Not good nor bad, BitLocker encryption is a symptom of our era, we need to protect ourselves and our data, BitLocker is a tool, as an IT we have to deal with it but it doesn't bring any benefit to my daily operations.
Read full review
Sophos
No answers on this topic
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
BitLocker Drive Encryption solution offering is cheaper than the one that McAfee offers, it will help you with specific business concerns like "how many encrypted assets do I have?" it's easy to maintain, easy to deploy, and easy to track. It's best suited for companies that are not trying to go far away on the disk encryption matter
Read full review
Sophos
At that time, we chose Sophos based on the reputation and our partnership with our partner. And in general Sophos could give us more benefit than other competitors with the similar solution. However we do not feel comfortable to disclose information about comparison with other solutions. Despite that, we think Sophos could deliver our requirements very well with the cost that were reasonable for us.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
Although the public Cloud Model follows Opex Costing Model, it actually leads to very high costs also, the infra model in my organization is not suited for a Public Cloud Model. Hence We decided on an On-Premise Model, and the best suited was VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a complete Software-Defined Scale-Out Architecture. I also prefer a Homogenous environment; i.e, support and services from a Single OEM, so that I Can get faster resolutions to my tickets raised.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • The biggest positive impact it has on ROI is the cost savings, since there is no cost to using the software.
  • Since it's widely available to anyone with a Windows computer, and the program is built into the operating system, there is no need to really install anything. This helps to save time of the IT department having to do installs, and also keep track of licensing, etc.
Read full review
Sophos
  • It's had a positive impact as it's allowed us to effectively secure hard drives with bitlocker encryption
  • A larger part of our work force works from home, and Sophos can be deployed remotely and will start encryption almost straight away on any computer that isn't already encrypted.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • My organization has a size of 1300+ employees, using multiple applications and an exchange mail server that is hosted on On-Premise Cloud, hence scalability has not been a challenge.
  • Having hosted my Production environment and Mail exchange Server on VCF, there has been optimum resource utilization with very little scope downtime. Hence have been able to save a lot of funds on Hardware resources.
  • Due to the size of my organization and due the data load, I have been able to save on Resource Utilization and Organization Funds
Read full review
ScreenShots