Bito vs. Codacy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bito
Score 0.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Bito is a productivity tool for developers that accelerates software development using AI models, like ChatGPT from OpenAI, and Anthropic. Bito’s plugin integrates into a developer’s IDE and CLI, providing access to their personal AI assistant.
$15
per month per user
Codacy
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis…
$0
Pricing
BitoCodacy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Open Source
$0.00
Startup
$0.00
Pro
$15.00
user/mo
Enterprise
$40.00
user/mo
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BitoCodacy
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BitoCodacy
Best Alternatives
BitoCodacy
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.1 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.9 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BitoCodacy
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BitoCodacy
Likelihood to Recommend
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
I recommend it for companies that use several programming languages, as it supports several languages ​​such as Java, Javascript, Python, among others. However, for companies that use only one programming language, there are specific tools for each language that can be more complete in this scenario. I do not recommend it for companies that only use open source software, in which case there are other tools available.
Read full review
Pros
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
  • Seamless and easy integrations with GitHub for fantastic pipeline of viewing errors.
  • Intuitive UI which is easy to customize and built-in patterns recommendations and security checks helps to fix issues faster.
  • Metrics and duplication and complexity easily identify areas that need attention to fix it easy.
  • Great for open-source projects.
Read full review
Cons
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
  • There should be customization to get code quality for your own projects if standards are provided.
  • Offline or a standalone application is much needed from Codacy to get local support.
  • Spots a lot of errors and small ones that don't affect much about quality and are de-facto standards.
Read full review
Support Rating
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
Great company and support team!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages ​​on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use other languages ​​in new products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bito
No answers on this topic
Codacy
  • The integration of Codacy with new code base is quick and easy.
  • Improves our code.
  • Easy to detect errors easily.
  • Ability to check duplicate codes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bito Screenshots

Screenshot of what Bito looks like in pull requestScreenshot of what separates BitoScreenshot of code review analyticsScreenshot of reviews by commandScreenshot of a chat with Bito about its review

Codacy Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of