Blueprint Platform vs. Worksoft Connective Automation Platform

Blueprints ability to generate reports is quite useful and comprehensive providing a good amount of information in a fairly detailed manner, thus assisting the entire decision-making management in a much more objective manner. The only issue we are facing is it cannot be customised for multiple teams.

Incentivized

• As I have worked with various ERP automation tools, Worksoft certify is a best tool in terms of End-to-End testing for SAP business processes.
• It is easy to understand by business people

Incentivized

• Blueprint is formatted similarly to some of the office programmes with which I am very Familiar
• Migration from one tool to another is easy
• Amazing detailed reports

Incentivized

• Prepared 25 end-to-end scenarios that leveraged 3,000 manual test cases and this was a big achievement for the customer to save the regression time and resources.
• It is fast to automate SAP projects
• Improved development cycle and nowadays customers are expecting "lights off" automation. We have scheduled lights off automation mode through Worksoft Certify.

Incentivized

• Blueprint cannot be customised for multiple teams
• The UI should be improved, It should be made user friendly
• The customer service time should improve

Incentivized

• Worksoft Certify solution could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly
• Test Data Management - No testing system will work with bad or interpreted data

Incentivized

Wooqer does not have reports and analytics and Blueprint has some really useful reports feature which was important for us.

Incentivized

SAP TAO is only alternate tool I would suggest.

Incentivized

• Positive: End to End business process validation and Fast Test development
• Licenses issues should be minimized

Incentivized