Broadridge Client Information Management vs. CommonSubDoc

This is well suited in the investment services area especially for multiple users and those working on a remote basis. A full integration of activity such as transactions, daily activity, client reporting, account updates, account processing are available. Majority of systems are real time for all end users as well as clients who choose to do so. Better feed back and notification on updates would be helpful.

Incentivized

• Interfaces with client view on mobile devices
• Strong library of compliance approved marketing materials
• Several methods of sorting, reporting, and documenting are available to the user.

Incentivized

• Better customization of labelling would be helpful on reports
• Alert notification of chosen activities could be implemented
• A favorites of certain functions would be helpful to streamline navigation

Incentivized

Artisan was evaluated but seen as a more costly system with too much customization needed. Broadridge Client Information Management is ready to use and the build out is less of a necessity. Artisan is available to those who would like more of a work in progress. We did also review XTIVA but it was cumbersome when bringing in outside, direct data.

Incentivized

• Positive in that many marketing services are available that I had once paid to receive.
• Positive in the data collection service for performance reporting as a time saver
• Positive in retrieval of statements, tax reports on an annual and archive basis.

Incentivized