TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CA Scheduler Job Management vs. Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CA Scheduler Job Management

    Score5 out of 10
    N/ACA Scheduler Job Management is IT workload automation software from CA Technologies.N/A

    Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOracle offers the Autonomous Transaction Processing, supporting database self-repair and maintenance with machine learning to eliminate human labor, human error, and manual tuning.

    $1.34

    OCPU Per Hour

    Pricing
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Transaction Processing
    $1.34
    OCPU Per Hour
    Exadata Storage
    $118.40
    Per Terabyte Per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of CA Scheduler Job Management and Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Feature
    CA Scheduler Job Management
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    -
    Ratings
    Logging8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    MongoDB Atlas
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Azure Database
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Google Cloud SQL
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CA Scheduler Job ManagementOracle Autonomous Transaction Processing
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Broadcom
    Job scheduling software for the IBM Mainframe is quite mature and most IBM Mainframe sites would already have one installed. It would appear to be very little reason to change from one scheduling package to another. If you were looking for a new scheduling package, CA Technologies is more likely to steer you towards their other product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    If your company's value is not increased by maintaining databases, you should use the ATP.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Broadcom
    • Good reporting on completed schedules and jobs including highest return code of jobs.
    • ISPF interface can cope with non-standard screen sizes.
    • Easy to use ISPF interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Quick and simple to deploy (less than 5 steps to create a new instance)
    • No administrative tasks (backup, re-sizing) required
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Broadcom
    • Monitoring interface could make better use of screen colours
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Connectivity between ATP and Oracle Kuberentes Engine cluster seems to drop randomly
    • The ATP could come in an even smaller shape as the smallest shape is already quite big . But if must be more than always free, as that version does have connectivity limitations about 20 connections
    Read full review
    Usability
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Oracle
    You get almost all the features of Oracle Database, including the ability to deploy APEX applications, without having to worry about system, storage or database configuration and maintenance, backups, etc. Also, you can start for free and move up adding resources as you need.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Broadcom
    All quite similar and as CA Scheduler had the smallest foot print across the agencies we support it is being decommmissioned
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Both Azure SQL Database and Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing offer a powerful and robust database platform. The advantage of Autonomous Transaction Processing is the ability to host APEX applications for free and without any special/complicated deployment or configuration process. Having a rapid development environment embedded for free was the main advantage for choosing Oracle as my cloud database provider.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Broadcom
    • Being decommissioned due to software rationalisation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Approx 100 times faster spin up than manual setup of an Oracle DB
    • 3h annual maintenance for big version releases (18c to 19c) compared to est. 500h annual maintenance with manual database updates
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Oracle Autonomous Transaction Processing Screenshots

    Screenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database takes automatic backupsScreenshot of Provisioning a new Autonomous Transaction Processing is simpleScreenshot of Autonomous Transaction Processing Database  ConsoleScreenshot of Auto scaling and manual scaling options of the database