CaliberLIMS vs. LigoLab LIS & RCM Operating Platform

CaliberLIMS is well suited for scenarios like overall QC data management like recording of results and review and approval of the same in LIMS. It will help to take decision of further batch processing to verify the result of previous step that whether it complies or not. verification of QC result in LIMS also help to decide release of batch. There shall be integration for SAP and LIMS would be help to eliminate manual entries in SAP

Incentivized

I'd highly recommend LigoLab for any lab environment looking to raise the efficiency of their daily workflow processes. A lot of other platforms require a bit of legwork to fit into a given workflow, but LigoLab is robust and adaptable with ample customer support that will allow you to find the most optimal solution to any issues you're facing. I would recommend it to any smaller lab focusing on anatomic pathology/molecular testing.

Incentivized

• Tracking of each and individual test results within nos. of batches samples
• Easy indentification for getting results and ongoing test analysis
• User friendly software

Incentivized

• Simplified Order Entry.
• Efficient Organization of Cases.
• Robust and Adaptable Reporting.
• Compilation of Detailed Statistics.
• Highly Customizable.

Incentivized

• Statistical analysis to be required to enhance software features
• Graphical and trending for each test results can helpful to identify ongoing product behaviour
• AI tools can use for searching and make user needed information from storage device

Incentivized

• Further customizability of certain core sections to display more information would be useful. There are some times when my users would like to have certain features or implementations available, but due to the restrictive nature of core functionality, these aren't easily configured or possible at times.
• Speed of platform. Due to how the program is implemented, booting it up can take some time on the user end though it is fine once someone enters the LIS environment. Ideally, we'd have faster load times for the program as that is the biggest complaint I receive from our doctors who use multiple systems on a daily basis.

Incentivized

• Good in return on investment
• Cost effective
• User friendly

Incentivized

• Since we've implemented the platform we've been able to provide our services to more clients by presenting them with a highly functional reporting platform that will efficiently distribute finalized reports to them directly. The ease of access on the platform has made our workflows more efficient and allowed us to reduce turnaround time from receipt of a specimen to final report release.

Incentivized