Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DB vs. Titan Distributed Graph Database

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AnzoGraph DB
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Cambridge Semantics in Boston offers AnzoGraph DB, a massively parallel processing (MPP) native graph database built for diverse data harmonization and analytics at scale (trillions of triples & more), speed and deep link insights. It is used for embedded analytics that require graph algorithms, graph views, named queries, aggregates, built-in data science functions, data warehouse-style BI and reporting functions.
$0
Titan
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Titan is an open-source distributed graph database developed by Aurelius. Aurelius is now part of Datastax (since February 2015).N/A
Pricing
Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DBTitan Distributed Graph Database
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnzoGraph DBTitan
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DBTitan Distributed Graph Database
Best Alternatives
Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DBTitan Distributed Graph Database
Small Businesses
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
Neo4j
Neo4j
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DBTitan Distributed Graph Database
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cambridge Semantics AnzoGraph DBTitan Distributed Graph Database
Likelihood to Recommend
Cambridge Semantics
No answers on this topic
Open Source
Titan is definitely a good choice, but it has its learning curve. The documentation may lack in places, and you might have to muster answers from different sources and technologies. But at its core, it does the job of storing and querying graph databases really well. Remember that titan itself is not the whole component, but utilizes other technologies like cassandra, gremlin, tinkerpop, etc to do many other things, and each of them has a learning curve. I would recommend titan for a team, but not for a single person. For single developer, go with Neo4j.
Read full review
Pros
Cambridge Semantics
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • Titan is really good for abstraction of underlying infrastructure. You can choose between different storage engine of your choice.
  • Open source, backed by community, and free.
  • Supports tinkerpop stack which is backed by apache.
  • Uses gremlin for query language making the whole query structure standardized and open for extension if another graph database comes along in future.
Read full review
Cons
Cambridge Semantics
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • The community is lacking deep documentation. I had to spend many nights trying to figure many things on my own. As graph databases will grow popular, I am sure this will be improved.
  • Not enough community support. Even in SO you might not find many questions. Though there are some users in SO who quickly answer graph database questions. Need more support.
  • Would love an official docker image.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cambridge Semantics
No answers on this topic
Open Source
To be honest, titan is not as popular as Neo4j, though they do the same thing. In my personal opinion, titan has lot of potential, but Neo4j is easier to use. If the organization is big enough, it might choose titan because of its open source nature, and high scalability, but Neo4j comes with a lot of enterprise and community support, better query, better documentation, better instructions, and is also backed by leading tech companies. But titan is very strong when you consider standards. Titan follows gremlin and tinkerpop, both of which will be huge in future as more graph database vendors join the market. If things go really well, maybe Neo4j might have to support gremlin as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cambridge Semantics
No answers on this topic
Open Source
  • Steep learning curve. Your engineers would have to spend lots of time learning different components before they feel comfortable.
  • Have to plan ahead. Maybe this is the nature of graph databases, but I found it difficult to change my schemas after I had data in production.
  • It is free, so time is the only resource you have to put in titan.
Read full review
ScreenShots