CAST Highlight vs. Codacy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CAST Highlight
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
CAST headquartered in New York offers Highlight, an application portfolio management solution providing software component analysis , application security, application benchmarking, and technical due diligence.
$25,000
per year
Codacy
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis…
$0
Pricing
CAST HighlightCodacy
Editions & Modules
Cloud
25k
Portfolio Size 25
SCA
$26k
Portfolio Size 25
Complete
33k
Portfolio Size 25
Open Source
$0.00
Startup
$0.00
Pro
$15.00
user/mo
Enterprise
$40.00
user/mo
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CAST HighlightCodacy
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsAnnual Pricing by Size of Application Portfolio
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CAST HighlightCodacy
Best Alternatives
CAST HighlightCodacy
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CAST HighlightCodacy
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.2
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CAST HighlightCodacy
Likelihood to Recommend
CAST
I think CAST is a great tool to give insight into your applications. The tool can be met with resistance from team members as the tool is going to expose defects that should be addressed. Out of the box, it may need some tailoring to focus on certain areas so that you are not overwhelmed with defects the first time you scan your code. But ultimately, you will want to eliminate all defects in the code and have all violations turned on.
Read full review
Codacy
I recommend it for companies that use several programming languages, as it supports several languages ​​such as Java, Javascript, Python, among others. However, for companies that use only one programming language, there are specific tools for each language that can be more complete in this scenario. I do not recommend it for companies that only use open source software, in which case there are other tools available.
Read full review
Pros
CAST
  • Identifies common coding vulnerabilities.
  • Compares code to industry best practices.
  • Assesses the code for data privacy compliance.
Read full review
Codacy
  • Seamless and easy integrations with GitHub for fantastic pipeline of viewing errors.
  • Intuitive UI which is easy to customize and built-in patterns recommendations and security checks helps to fix issues faster.
  • Metrics and duplication and complexity easily identify areas that need attention to fix it easy.
  • Great for open-source projects.
Read full review
Cons
CAST
  • Code scans could be faster. A large application may need to be broken down into smaller sub-applications in order to facilitate faster code scans.
  • We spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to best structure our code base in the application for ultimate performance.
Read full review
Codacy
  • There should be customization to get code quality for your own projects if standards are provided.
  • Offline or a standalone application is much needed from Codacy to get local support.
  • Spots a lot of errors and small ones that don't affect much about quality and are de-facto standards.
Read full review
Support Rating
CAST
Tech support and pro services are top-notch.
Read full review
Codacy
Great company and support team!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CAST
These other tools only do a part of what CAST does. CAST gives a comprehensive view into the code looking at all aspects, code quality, security, maintainability, vulnerability, privacy, reuse, etc. These other tools only focus on one or two dimensions.
Read full review
Codacy
Even though it is paid while SonarQube is free, we chose Codacy because it is simpler to configure and maintain the implemented rules. In addition, it offers support for the main programming languages ​​on the market, ensuring that we can continue to use it if we want to use other languages ​​in new products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CAST
  • I believe once we had the tool working for our code base, we immediately saw positive ROI.
  • We spent some time getting to where our code code be scanned efficiently but some of that was trying to do things ourselves instead of fully utilizing Cast Professional Services. I highly recommend to do an engagement with CAST to have them help setup the tool in your environment or to run it in the cloud for you.
Read full review
Codacy
  • The integration of Codacy with new code base is quick and easy.
  • Improves our code.
  • Easy to detect errors easily.
  • Ability to check duplicate codes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CAST Highlight Screenshots

Screenshot of Application Portfolio ManagementScreenshot of Software Composition AnalysisScreenshot of Portfolio Advisor for Open SourceScreenshot of Portfolio Advisor for CloudScreenshot of Cloud Migration Blockers and Boosters

Codacy Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of