TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CB Permissions Replicator vs. Digital.ai TeamForge

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CB Replicator

    Score2 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    A major problem of storing Dynamics 365 documents in SharePoint is the missing synchronization of privileges and permissions. This allows unauthorized SharePoint users to access private documents and sensitive data even if they don’t have CRM privileges to do so. CB Replicator, is an out-of-the-box solution that is designed to remedy this issue by automatically synchronizing Dynamics CRM privileges with SharePoint permissions.

    $3,600

    per 100 users

    Digital.ai TeamForge

    Score7 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Digital.ai (formerly CollabNet) aims to help enterprises and government organizations deliver high-quality software at speed with TeamForge, its application lifecycle management suite. According to the vendor, Digital.ai offers innovative solutions, provides consulting and Agile training services, supports more than 10,000 customers with 6 million users in 100 countries, and has been recognized for 13 consecutive years as SD Times 100 “Best in Show” winner in the…N/A
    Pricing
    CB ReplicatorDigital.ai TeamForge
    Editions & Modules
    CB Dynamics CRM to SharePoint Permission Replicator for 100 User
    $3,600
    per 100 users
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CB ReplicatorDigital.ai TeamForge
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup Fee$80 per userNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CB ReplicatorDigital.ai TeamForge
    Small Businesses
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Polarion ALM
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    PTC Windchill RV&S
    Score2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Tungsten Capture
    Score9.5 out of 10
    IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management
    Score5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CB ReplicatorDigital.ai TeamForge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CB ReplicatorDigital.ai TeamForge
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Connecting Software
    It is an ideal program for the portfolio of already consolidated clients, for large financial companies with a high professional profile. In the cases that I do not recommend it, it is for small and medium-sized financial companies, with a portfolio of clients in training, since the cost-benefit ratio is not attractive.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Connecting Software
    • Visually friendly for the end user, maintaining the most common design style for workers
    • The adaptation time and the learning curve is relatively shorter than other similar applications
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • Code security.
    • Code migration.
    • Agile tie-in.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Connecting Software
    • The graphics could be developed in a better way, they should be more modern, friendly and show the information in more detail.
    • Develop a module in the application that allows personalization by the user, giving him the possibility to manage a tool made by him to suit him. Moves the APPS Mobile concept to the design of the program.
    • Although the tool is well integrated with Microsoft, you can think of a development of integration with social networks or mobile developments, both users, and customers.
    • Develop a more economical and simple version, aimed at small and medium enterprises, with small client portfolios
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
    • I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
    • I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Connecting Software
    It is a complementary tool of the main CRM, which provides an adequate management of the documentation, reports, files that are derived from the business activity. It offers adequate levels of security for small businesses, the implementation is easy compared to other tools, it is easy to use, it offers adequate file capacity. In the future it can be strengthened with access to the cloud, development of apps and integration with other platforms.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Connecting Software
    As it has already been said before, it is a simple implementation program, easy to use, with a short learning curve, with a friendly interface, a good design, a security according to the type of company and with the possibility of personalization. It provides an accessible cost tool to improve business management and document management.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Connecting Software
    Until now, technical support has not been required to a large extent, but for this question three variables must be taken into account; The level of complexity of the implementation of the tool, the courses, tutorials, training and learning curve of the users, and finally the technical support as such. This tool has implementation attributes and ease of use, reducing the incidence of technical support.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Connecting Software
    Check the seller's website, read the technical specifications of the product, calculate the investment in personnel, software and hardware, validate that the management modules document is what they are looking for. Project the integration of the program with the systems that the company manages. Read many reviews and note the most important points of the user experiences.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Connecting Software
    Basically, my main experience is focused on Dynamics, I have worked with similar tools developed in a particular way by the firms for which I have worked. They are monitoring tools developed by the system and planning area. For the internal use of the company. Obviously, this is a leading international program.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
    CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
    JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Connecting Software
    • Without speaking directly of figures, on the positive side of the implementation of the program is tied to the time of learning the tool. In practice, it is much easier to learn by professionals, making the implementation time short, as well as, minimizes the margin of error in the initial handling of the program.
    • As it is a tool for easy learning and with a reduction in the margin of error due to the learning curve, it allows working only with the technical support offered by the provider, without having the need to create an internal department of attention to the user, which lowers costs.
    Read full review
    Digital.ai (formerly XebiaLabs, CollabNet VersionOne, and Arxan)
    • Unfortunately, I do not have access to ROI information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    CB Replicator Screenshots

    Screenshot of User MappingScreenshot of Starting and Stopping the ServiceScreenshot of Edit Configuration

    Digital.ai TeamForge Screenshots

    Screenshot of TeamForge OverviewScreenshot of TeamForge Reporting DashboardScreenshot of Chef Deployment TraceabilityScreenshot of Defects Trend Report