censhare vs. Hygraph

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
censhare
Score 7.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
censhare’s Universal Content Management platform is an automated, centralized solution to manage all kinds of digital content. Fully integrated, it removes the need to work with multiple systems with different user interfaces, freeing teams to create innovative and powerful customer experiences. With censhare, content is no longer splintered across a variety of servers, workstations and cloud services. All data is held centrally and interlinked by relationships that can be searched quickly.…
$1,000
per month, 5 named users
Hygraph
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Pricing
censhareHygraph
Editions & Modules
censhare DAM
$1,000
per month, 5 named users
censhare DAM
$1,000
per month, 5 named users, excluding SaaS hosting cost and maintenance
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
censhareHygraph
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsIn general, pricing is based upon selected functionality and number of users. For SaaS deployments additional charges apply.35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
censhareHygraph
Features
censhareHygraph
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
censhare
-
Ratings
Hygraph
8.7
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Collaborative editing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content templates00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Approval and authoring workflows00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
censhareHygraph
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Contentful
Contentful
Score 7.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
censhareHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
censhareHygraph
Likelihood to Recommend
censhare AG
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
Read full review
Pros
censhare AG
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is easy to work with from the "non-engineer" side of things.
  • GraphCMS is very flexible on what data models we can create and how those models are formed.
  • GraphCMS uses Graph API, which is easy to write (compared to older API patterns).
Read full review
Cons
censhare AG
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
  • GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
  • GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
  • Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
censhare AG
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius
Read full review
Return on Investment
censhare AG
No answers on this topic
Hygraph
  • Better use of time for our engineers in the long run.
  • More control of content for people outside of the engineer team.
  • Allows people to edit the content on their own, so they don't need to wait until a developer is available to add something to the website.
Read full review
ScreenShots

censhare Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable DashboardScreenshot of DAM - Gallery ViewScreenshot of DAM - Asset DetailScreenshot of DAM - Video AI TranscriptionScreenshot of PIM - Product DetailScreenshot of Marketing Project Planning - Gantt Chart View