Centreon vs. HPE OneView

It is a good product that is robust. They have a free version that makes the value good. If it cost money then the install and plugins would need polishing. But overall it is a good product that does what it says it does. But definitely not for beginners you do need some knowledge to set it up and get it running

Incentivized

I have found that HPE OneView is well suited for all of our scenarios in our shared data center platform to control all the compute hardware with firmware, patches and profiles of all compute components.

Incentivized

• Monitor
• Install
• Stability

Incentivized

• Managing the overall Blade profiles and the ability to have access to all equipment from one central repository.

Incentivized

• The install
• More plugins
• The alerting

Incentivized

• Managing the 3Pard Oneview will allow you to do things like reuse LUN IDs and setup multiple export groups with the same volume. This can cause performance issues, or worse. They could do a better job of protecting you from yourself...
• Complicated initial configuration

Incentivized

Support and training when we implemented OneView were excellent. We haven't required any additional support since we put it in and configured it for our systems. The OneView systems have been stable through updates and HPE documentation is excellent.

Incentivized

Centreon does a good job against these products. Of courseCentreon can be free and that is what we used. So it is not quite the same the other products are more polished and support is readily available. But Centreon is still good and if you have some knowledge can work just as well

Incentivized

If you are using modern HPE equipment there really are no alternatives.

Incentivized

• It does monitoring very well
• Details on issues is good
• Customization is great.

Incentivized

• Easy to use and saves time in maintenance.

Incentivized