Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cylance Smart Antivirus

Check Point Endpoint Security is well suited for businesses where confidentiality must be maintained in order to mitigate risk and compromise of customer information

Incentivized

Cylance Smart Antivirus is well suited for the typical office user. It can be very restrictive if you do not tune it properly and can cause many issues. When tuned and set up properly it is appropriate for 95% of use cases. The last 5% are ones that have the capabilities of bringing an organization down if it is not tuned properly.

Incentivized

• Identifies ransomware
• Low resource usage
• Self remediation

Incentivized

• Blocking Scripts
• Stopping remote exploits
• easy to install

Incentivized

• The prompts for one time logins are rather lengthy and it takes around five minutes to go through all of the authentication required. I believe this could be improved upon.

Incentivized

• Better functionality to whitelist on the Application.
• Easier to setup Mobile Settings
• Easier to understand logs

Incentivized

I found that Check Point identified more Ransomware attacks than Kaspersky.

Incentivized

Cylance was the first AI scanning-based AV on the market. While Webroot was competitive we found Cylance to be the better solution.

Incentivized

• It has enabled us to maintain privacy which has enhanced our highly rated brand standard. While basically it is a team member specific, behind the scenes program that protects systems from being used by unauthorized individuals, it contributes to the overall integrity of the organization which results in increased market share and return on investment for shareholders.

Incentivized

• Too much time to manage.
• Too many false positives.
• Too much lost productivity.

Incentivized