Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Sophos Central Device Encryption

Check Point Endpoint Media Encryption and Port Protection (Pointsec) is well suited for Microsoft Windows environment. While, for MacOS it is less appropriate.

Incentivized

We found the incorporated system of both AV and Encryption to be an absolute breath of fresh air for us. It is great for small and mid-sized companies. We rolled this out across our 4 global regions. We created region-specific groups for our endpoints and placed the appropriate endpoints into those groups. [Then] we defined policies for AV and Encryption that would be used inter-region and assigned roles to the different regions' support staff. Great stuff.

Incentivized

• Requires authorized passwords and logins from end users.
• Utilizes voiceprint recognition to validate users.
• Allows for a one time login from end users working remotely away from their desks.

Incentivized

• Email encryption, it can encrypt based on the criteria defined. We use regex for this to discover the content.
• We can have a view of what is the content of the email being quarantined.
• We use Sophos together with our Email Exchange

Incentivized

• Types of devices to control needs to be added like McAfee and GFI Endpoint Security.
• Device whitelisting needs more granular level like by Vendor ID, Serial Number, Device ID etc.
• Device Control and Media Protection on MacOS to be added.

Incentivized

• simply the interface
• usability for non technical teams

Incentivized

Symantec Encryption, a few management points led me to evaluate and not go with it.

Incentivized

The only other one we looked at was Symantec endpoint encryption this seemed less feature reach and less user friendly.

Incentivized

• Stops Ransomware attacks
• Easy to manage
• Easy to deploy

Incentivized

• Intangible benefits to the organization data, data is highly secure
• No worries to users and IT for data stolen outside the organization
• Protected from malware and ransomware

Incentivized