Checkmarx vs. GoodAccess
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmarx | Score7.6 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST) | N/A |
GoodAccess | Score9.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform (SASE/SSE) that empowers medium-sized enterprises to easily implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) in their infrastructure, regardless of its complexity or scale. By leveraging a Low-Code/No-Code approach, GoodAccess delivers a hardware-free, rapid deployment solution within hours or days, allowing companies to enhance their security without the need for in-house IT experts. The platform ensures… | $35 per month for 5 users (minimum) |
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 26 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 26 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zero Trust Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Enterprises | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 | Forescout Vistaro Platform Score6.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | 7.7 | - |
| Support Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Checkmarx | GoodAccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | GoodAccess Screenshots |









