TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Checkmarx vs. Imprivata Enterprise Access Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Checkmarx

    Score7.6 out of 10
    N/ACheckmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)N/A

    Imprivata Enterprise Access Management

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/AImprivata Enterprise Access Management is a single sign-on (SSO) and authentication management, dedicated to fast but secure audit-proof clinical data access.N/A
    Pricing
    CheckmarxImprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CheckmarxImprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    CheckmarxImprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Small Businesses
    Rencore Code (SPCAF)
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Atlassian Crowd
    Score6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security
    Score9.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CheckmarxImprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (5 ratings)
    9.3
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    7.7
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CheckmarxImprivata Enterprise Access Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Checkmarx
    If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    It's a very good tool for anyone in the industry who wants to deploy Multi Factor authentication to make their company safe and secure. It is best suited for companies where a majority of the workforce works in the field; and access to company data using internet can be a little risky. Imprivata One-sign will make the connection more secure and safe.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Checkmarx
    • Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail.
    • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories.
    • Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    • Allows admins to enable single sign-on to additional applications without Imprivata services. After a quick training session with Imprivata, most admins are easily able to enable additional apps.
    • Works well with many device types including Windows, IGEL, Teradici and many Linux based thin clients.
    • High availability and failover. Imprivata's implementation of this was one of the most well thought out and easy to implement of any solutions in our stack. It works very similar to Active Directory, but requires no real config or settings to make it happen. Add an additional appliance and the enterprise is automatically synchronized. If an appliance goes down, client software is aware and automatically switched to another appliance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Checkmarx
    • Scan duration
    • False positives
    • Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    • Building the application profiles is not always simple.
    • Better application integration with Java would be beneficial.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Checkmarx
    Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Checkmarx
    Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    None of the other toolsets offered Epic integration. I spent 9 months testing other SSO tools and found them to be slow and tied to specific tools and or workflows only. Imprivata OneSign was the only truly universal tool that I could find that was adaptable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Checkmarx
    • Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence
    • Improved confidence in application-level security
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Imprivata
    • Increase in security prevents lost revenue due to fines over security breaches.
    • Easier password management allows for smaller tech team.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots