TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Checkmk

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ACheckmk is a solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors. It can be deployed under all major Linux distributions or users can run it as Docker container or virtual appliance on other operating systems including Windows. The tool is available as a Raw Edition, which is open-source, and as an Enterprise Edition with a many additional enterprise features. The…

    $0

    up to 10 systems

    HPE OneView

    Score6 out of 10
    N/AHPE OneView is an IT infrastructure monitoring platform, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
    Pricing
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Editions & Modules
    Checkmk Free Edition
    $0.00
    up to 10 systems
    Checkmk Raw Edition
    $0.00
    unlimited & always free
    Checkmk Enterprise Edition
    starting at $600.00
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup Fee$600 for up to 3,000 Services / around 100 hostsNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Monitoring Tasks
    Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Checkmk and HPE OneView
    Feature
    Checkmk
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    18% above category average
    HPE OneView
    -
    Ratings
    Network device monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple Server Monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-device monitoring10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated alerts and notifications10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management Tasks
    Comparison of Management Tasks features of Checkmk and HPE OneView
    Feature
    Checkmk
    7.0
    1 Ratings
    1% above category average
    HPE OneView
    -
    Ratings
    Software and hardware inventory7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting
    Comparison of Reporting features of Checkmk and HPE OneView
    Feature
    Checkmk
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    23% above category average
    HPE OneView
    -
    Ratings
    Data visualization10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Checkmk and HPE OneView
    Feature
    Checkmk
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    9% above category average
    HPE OneView
    -
    Ratings
    Data backup and recovery8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Small Businesses
    Amazon CloudWatch
    Score7.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    LogicMonitor
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Icinga
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ManageEngine Site24x7
    Score10 out of 10
    Zabbix
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CheckmkHPE OneView
    Likelihood to Recommend
    tribe29
    As we have many different applications running on different servers, we appreciate the possibility of writing our own scripts to monitor the different processes and elements. Using scripts of our choice helps us a lot, as we have many different administrators. Thus, we are able to be prepared for upcoming outages or events.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    HPE Oneview has come along way. When they first put it out it was next to useless. Over the years and versions, they listened to feedback and have made OneView into a truly enterprise-level robust management product. It is now a far better product than the old C7000 Blade OAs, and HP SIM. It makes management of hardware easy and makes much of the maintenance easier and safer than before. For the storage side it does a great job and is intuitive to use, but the very versatility of how you can do things can lead to issues if multiple engineers do things differently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    tribe29
    • monitoring
    • alerts
    • Graphs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Managing the overall Blade profiles and the ability to have access to all equipment from one central repository.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    tribe29
    • Layout
    • Ease of Use
    • Upgradability
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • Managing the 3Pard Oneview will allow you to do things like reuse LUN IDs and setup multiple export groups with the same volume. This can cause performance issues, or worse. They could do a better job of protecting you from yourself...
    • Complicated initial configuration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    tribe29
    Very helpful software and I highly recommend to have on hand as a tool for testing, troubleshooting, and monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    tribe29
    After knowing the architecture it is very easy to manage the system, rolling out agents and creating new monitoring tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    tribe29
    never contaced support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    Support and training when we implemented OneView were excellent. We haven't required any additional support since we put it in and configured it for our systems. The OneView systems have been stable through updates and HPE documentation is excellent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    tribe29
    We moved over to Checkmk from Nagios which felt like a natural evolution at the time as the raw version is based on Nagios, I vaguely not having any major issues moving over at the time. We still use the Raw version but we are planning to move to the enterprise version in the next 6 – 12 months as our needs expand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    If you are using modern HPE equipment there really are no alternatives.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    tribe29
    • avoid downtime
    • Plan updates based on usage of a VM or network switch to avoid impacting users
    • User satisfaction increased due to less visible downtime or issues with our IT infrastructure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)
    • No impact one way or the other for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots