Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs. FatPipe SD-WAN
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is a software-defined wide area network solution designed to simplify and optimize enterprise network connectivity in complex digital landscapes. It enables organizations to connect any user to any application, whether on-premises, in data centers, or across multiple clouds, with integrated capabilities for multicloud support, security, predictive automation, and enhanced network visibility—all built on a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)-enabled… | N/A |
FatPipe SD-WAN | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | FatPipe Networks, headquartered in Salt Lake City, offers SD-WAN products designed to provide solutions for an easy migration to Hybrid WAN. FatPipe delivers companies the ability to centrally manage their wide area network, manage branch office configurations, and deploy appliances with the zero-touch installation. A company ca add direct Internet access at a branch to increase available bandwidth. FatPipe's advanced policy management allows cloud destined applications to be routed directly out… | N/A |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | FatPipe SD-WAN | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 133 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
94% Delivers good value for the price 116 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
97% Happy with the feature set 135 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
91% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 93 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
87% Implementation went as expected 109 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco Meraki SD-WAN Score8.6 out of 10 | Cisco Meraki SD-WAN Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | VMware SD-WAN Score7.9 out of 10 | Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.9 | - |
| Usability | 8.7 | - |
| Availability | 8.0 | - |
| Performance | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | - |
| Configurability | 10.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 7.0 | - |
| Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |
