Cisco CloudLock vs. Palo Alto Networks Next-Gen CASB

Cisco Cloudlock is a good fit for my organization consisting of 150 end users. While we have a small office product that can expand to cover any size organization, I would assume the overhead to monitor would increase. While my organization's business is in real estate, I would highly recommend this for all businesses that handle sensitive and private data. Being able to monitor our cloud infrastructure has allowed our security team to be more flexible in allowing approved users access as well.

Incentivized

• Cisco CloudLock offers a remote access options, very efficient and standard.
• Robust data security and monitoring of the sensitive database.
• Has an excellent self service, which is an option for quick operational progress.

Incentivized

• Although alert mechanism is good but it delays a bit.
• For implementation of DLP we had to hire a expert it took a lot of time to set up.
• Support [in my experience] is not good.

Incentivized

They are very quick to respond and go the extra mile to help address our issues. That said, we've only needed them at the early stages of implementation for support help and occasionally when we want to do a full re-scan of our site. They are very flexible in working with us on the timing of such scans.

Incentivized

Amazon Macie is limited to an AWS environment and fulfills some of the same functions that CloudLock does in SaaS products. Both are very valuable tools, so the decision is not really which to use, but whether to use both for their respective environments. In general I feel CloudLock is a more powerful tool because it connects to Microsoft 365, which is more business critical for our organization, but that really is a personal call.

Incentivized

• Allowed data to be accessed.
• Secured data.
• Meet client security requirements.

Incentivized