TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics vs. Symantec Content & Malware Analysis

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ACisco now offers advanced security analytics via the eponymous Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics, a solution that delivers Cisco AnyConnect endpoint data to prebuilt Splunk analytics and dashboards. The vendor states that the service provides deep endpoint insight that even EPP and EDR solutions don't address.N/A

    Symantec Content & Malware Analysis

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ASymantec Content & Malware Analysis is an application which provides advanced threat detection and threat hunting through advanced machine learning, based on intelligence gathered from ProxySG, threat intelligence services, and other sources.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco Endpoint Security AnalyticsSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Endpoint Security AnalyticsSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco Endpoint Security AnalyticsSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire
    Score9 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks WildFire
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
    Score7.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco Endpoint Security AnalyticsSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Endpoint Security AnalyticsSymantec Content & Malware Analysis
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is best suited for larger environments that need a window into basic logs of what users are experiencing. It provides adequate protection. We have had some issues with false positive detection of apps that are common, especially when downloading program setup files and such. Overall, it is a decent product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    If you have Symantec based environment including Symantec proxy and endpoints, Content and Malware Analysis is the obvious choice. You can't run the CAS-MAS as a standalone deployment, you need proxies or ICAP supported devices capable to send the files/URLS. It's not a network security device where you can flow/direct the traffic to C/MAS. It does not have UBA, NBA or NTR features, it is just working for analyzing files as expected.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Provides details about what apps are being used
    • Threat detection
    • Analytics
    • Budget friendly
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • 0 day detection and prevenion
    • Flawless integration with Symantec Ecosystem
    • Integration with other vendors supporting ICAP is also working
    • Custom and golden image support
    • High performance on busy environments
    • Many threats are already detected and prevented through the CAS, it improves the performance drastically.
    • Already builtin virustotal integration
    • Reference to updates and updates information where I can see the product/service detecting which APTs
    • Multiple Antivirus engines which you can select/subscribe
    • Manual submission of file is supported through the gui
    • URL manual submission is also supported
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • False positive detection of files and apps that should be whitelisted
    • Needs a better interface for administration
    • Could be easier to deploy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • API support is lacking
    • Symantec/Broadcom security vision in general
    • Symantec support is not perfect
    • You can't run the product as a standalone network device
    • No packet capture capabiliy or work in span mode
    • You need a dedicated hardware to make it run
    • You need to buy
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is semi easy to use. However, the reports are sometimes a bit lacking in detail. We do get alerts when someone encounters something malicious. However, it would be nice to see a bit more detail as to where the malicious file came from so that we can better protect our network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics is easier to use than any of these products and seems to offer a better level of security. Symantec has failed to deliver any kind of support or updates since the Broadcom acquistion. The other products seem to be more geared to home or small office use. We chose Cisco Endpoint Security Analytics because we trust the brand and it seems to offer more features than the competition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    We have been using many solutions even tested nearly all available 0day sandbox solutions in the market. We choose Symantec CMA as we have already Symantec endpoint protection/EDR on the client, Symantec proxy for the web access, SCMA fits our environment. We have a big bargain when we puchase lots of equipment from the Symantec. Detection and prevention is very good at SCMA but some constant issues; like the product is not designed for heterogeneous environments, we can not integrate the SCMA with WAFs, it's lacking in api and request/reply calls. There's no file scanning, discover the option. SIEM integration is not smooth. I can not run some of the SOAR playbooks through the SCMA.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Has prevented malware/virus infiltration
    • Product has given insight into apps on the network
    • Provides a basic level of oversight
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Broadcom
    • 0-day and APT risk is covered by the SCMA
    • As the SSL is inspected and analyzed at Bluecoat proxy servers, hidden threats, malicous files are passed to SCMA to be analyzed.
    • Getting full visibility at file trajectory level
    • As it's a full proxy and ICAP integration, we are sure that the files are to analyzed and scanned for malicious activity. This is a big plus compared to NGFW analyze concept, as the NGFWs have special failsafe mechanisms allowing bypass of file analysis. SCMA fully catches the hidden threats.
    • Flawless integration with Bluecoat systems is a big plus, customers are getting the same type of messages within their browsers.
    • A negative impact is the standardization when I deploy SCAM to one of our locations. Then the auditors demand the same coverage within other areas and it comes with the cost. Especially maintaining these devices on premise environment has a significant cost.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots