TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco FabricPath vs. NETGEAR Managed Switches

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco FabricPath

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACisco's FabricPath is a brand of LAN switch.N/A

    NETGEAR Managed Switches

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ANETGEAR ProSafe Managed Switches is San Jose headquartered NETGEAR's line of LAN switch technology.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco FabricPathNETGEAR Managed Switches
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco FabricPathNETGEAR Managed Switches
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco FabricPathNETGEAR Managed Switches
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    SolarWinds Virtualization Manager (VMAN)
    Score10 out of 10
    RUCKUS Ethernet Switches
    Score1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OpenManage Integration for VMware vCenter
    Score7.6 out of 10
    Cisco Ethernet Switches
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco FabricPathNETGEAR Managed Switches
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco FabricPathNETGEAR Managed Switches
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    Cisco FabricPath seems to be well suited for larger datacenters where you need the scalability and flexibility that's provided. We've been able to provide our customers with much more bandwidth than they previously had throughout our datacenter and with applications generating much more east/west traffic now rather than large volumes of north/south traffic FabricPath and the nexus switches have given us the ability to provide our customers with the bandwidth that's needed to serve today's applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NETGEAR
    Well suited for a small business with minimal IT capital.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • It scales fairly well.
    • It's been fairly easy for people to learn and work with.
    • It has simplified network administration by utilizing Fabric Extenders which are all configured from the same switch and treated as an extension of the switch rather than as a separate entity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NETGEAR
    • The switches met the data transfer needs of a small business with about 30 users and 4 servers.
    • The web interface was adequate for a business that didn't have the need to dive into a device with a CLI.
    • These were wall mounted. Not the best network design, but small businesses cut corners. The mounting holes helped with this "solution".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • We've had a few bugs that have caused random reloads of switches when modifying VLANS.
    • We've had a bug that reloaded an entire fabric at once.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NETGEAR
    • Both switches were the same model number, same firmware. One switch needed to be rebooted about every 5 weeks. This problem was never resolved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    In comparison to Cisco ACI, Cisco Catalyst, and Juniper EX Switches the Nexus switches have stood their ground and we've been fairly happy with them. I like that similar to Cisco's ACI and the Juniper EX switches that I've worked with I can manage multiple chassis from one place. ACI can do this on a much larger scale though. I think Juniper limited the number of devices in a single virtual chassis to 10 or less depending on the device type. ACI can do a few hundred leafs plus their fabric extenders so if you're looking for one place to manage all your devices it can scale well beyond either the Cisco FP or Juniper EX series switches, but it also has a much steeper learning curve and completely different interface. The loop prevention built into FP has been a great improvement vs our old Catalyst switches.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NETGEAR
    The NetGear switches are definitely entry-level switches. They don't have the functionality (or cost) of Dell, HP, nor Cisco. But for the money, a business that is just starting out can't complain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • FabricPath is easy enough to learn that the adoption on the team has been fairly quick. This allows us to quickly troubleshoot and allows us to meet and beat SLAs that demand we maintain 99.99%+ uptime for our paying customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    NETGEAR
    • The NetGear switches made a positive impact as entry level switches for a startup company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots