Cisco Secure IPS vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Secure IPS
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Secure IPS (formerly Firepower Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention System, or NGIPS) is an intrusion detection response system that produces security data and enhances the analysis by InsightOps. The technology replaces the former Sourcefire 3D IPS. Cisco acquired Sourcefire in 2013.N/A
Microsoft Defender for Identity
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Identity (formerly Azure Advanced Threat Protection, also known as Azure ATP) is a cloud-based security solution that leverages on-premises Active Directory signals to identify, detect, and investigate advanced threats, compromised identities, and malicious insider actions directed at the organization.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Best Alternatives
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Small Businesses
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 6.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
ManageEngine ADAudit Plus
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(6 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Secure IPSMicrosoft Defender for Identity
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Cisco Secure IPS is required for every organization and it gives us all the advanced security features for more visibility and control on our incoming and outgoing network traffic. We can easy to configure and management is also very easy. You can deploy in the existing network very easily. The price is very low and performance is very high and it works very quickly on threats and takes the necessary action.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Identity is a great solution for each company that has an Active Directory. It fills in the blanks for Identity related incidents that are being missed in the XDR platform. To get a full view on identity risks it is an essential component
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • The option to deploy it as a virtual machine in a UCS-E inside a Cisco Router is something to consider a lot. It simplifies a lot the deployment in places where you need to optimize resources and keep things simple. It also saves some money on unnecessary hardware.
  • Having the most complete license, we can have in the same box IPS, inspection for malware and URL filtering. As Cisco uses Talos Intelligence network to mitigate and evaluate risks, having this complete set of security features turns the box into a powerful resource to protect our remote locations. Considering the hyper-connected business we have today, it's almost impossible to think that we can run a business without this kind of protection.
  • The integration between Firepower NGIPS and other products, like Cisco ISE and Splunk, is also a key feature for this solution. In both cases, you can integrate the product to have the best of both. As a security appliance, it's very important for us to have all the logs centralized in Splunk and this is done simply connecting FMC (Firepower Management Console) to the Splunk collector.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • detect threats and suspicious activities
  • pro-active measurements on possible breaches
  • identity security posture
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Wish additional modules were included such as FireAmp.
  • Wish it was easier to include customized signatures if needed. Required to know how to code with Snort in order to add real customization.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • setup can be complicated, with AD complexity
  • Sometimes the load on DCs is pretty high, leading to performance issues
  • Better tuning options for preventing false-positive/bening alerts
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
We are in the middle of outsourcing and may not be able to keep this product.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
Very easy to navigate GUI in the FMC and very effective at performing the intending duties.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
We didn't have any major issues that let us need support. Only, for this reason, I think Cisco Firepower deserves the rating. Even for small issues, the partner that helped us during the project could solve it quickly. There are also tons of documents and other online resources to help maintain, administer and support the product.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Cisco Secure IPS is our first product. We were not using any other tools before. We are very happy with the Cisco Secure IPS features and customer support
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Defender for Identity is more specialized on the Identity platform, it is a single solution compared to a multi-solution. The integration is better when using the XDR suite in combination with Sentinel. Microsoft Defender for Identity gives a better overview of the security posture
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Has made it much easier to determine when incidents have occurred
  • Has been effective in reducing false positives and making solution management more efficient and cost effective
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Cost impact was pretty high
  • Learning curve, needed time (money) for training
  • Greatly improved detections and gives more insights
Read full review
ScreenShots