Cisco Secure Malware Analytics vs. Veracode
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Secure Malware Analytics (formerly Threat Grid) combines advanced sandboxing with threat intelligence into one unified solution to protect organizations from malware. With a context-aware malware knowledge base, the user can understand what malware is doing or attempting to do, how large a threat it poses, and how to defend against it. On June 16 2014 Cisco completed the acquisition of ThreatGRID, a New York, NY based company that offers dynamic malware analysis and threat intelligence… | N/A |
Veracode | Score8.5 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine. | N/A |
| Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Veracode | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Developer pricing options available | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 128 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Delivers good value for the price 90 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Happy with the feature set 132 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 76 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 86% Implementation went as expected 101 Answers | |
| Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Rencore Code (SPCAF) Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Palo Alto Networks WildFire Score9 out of 10 | Trend Vision One Email and Collaboration Security Score9.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Trellix Intelligent Sandbox Score7.1 out of 10 | Checkmarx Score7.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 6.3 |
| Usability | - | 5.5 |
| Availability | - | 7.3 |
| Performance | - | 2.7 |
| Support Rating | - | 7.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 5.5 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 4.5 |
| Ease of integration | - | 6.4 |
| Product Scalability | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 8.2 |
| Cisco Secure Malware Analytics | Veracode | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Veracode Screenshots |







