Cisco SecureX vs SentinelOne Singularity

This is perfect for organisations with small or limited security teams who want to get more from their Cisco and third-party investments. With Secure Endpoint makes detecting and responding to threats much easier. Any organisation looking to overhaul its security infrastructure or even wrap around its cloud-first strategy with solutions such as Intune should seriously look at Cisco’s suite of products. I’ve implemented Secure Endpoint, Umbrella, and Duo for customers primarily using Intune for device management, and the cool new insight features in Cisco SecureX really help with visibility over their estate.

I'm not sure about pricing but I have heard from larger companies that it was not very accessible because of their size. We are a small company and we also utilize a SIEM which helped offset costs right off the bat. I think it makes 100% sense for IT departments that don't have enough staff to monitor their environment in depth.

• It provides high visibility of the entire business infrastructure, thus being able to maintain a more enhanced security.
• It makes the workflow much less burdensome for the enterprise security team, as it performs analytics that help detect known and unknown threats.
• It allows the automation of the workflow, which gives us the advantage of responding and detecting threats faster.
• It quickly and accurately identifies what caused the attack and what its scope has been so that carrying out a remediation is simpler.

• SentinelOne provides excellent protection against known and unknown attacks to our endpoints.
• The recovery option provides a fast, first line of defense against ransomware and other system damaging attacks.
• SentinelOne requires minimal administrative support making it a very cost effective and efficient solution.

• Bloated Single-Sign On.
• Glitchy and unreliable dashboards.
• Significant difficulty in integrating other Cisco Products.
• No real time saved - I have to log into the service to get a full picture of a dashboard.
• A SIEM is better in every way - this product is a SIEM lite and does the job poorly.

• It would be helpful if SentinelOne had better automation for updating client versions.
• Simplified setup of Ranger Deploy.
• Client onboarding could be improved.

Reliable for simple installation and above all efficient

Compared to all the other major players, SentinelOne is truly hands off. One installed, the tool is able to manage all the major threats on my endpoints without intervention. The biggest thing the IT Dept has to do now is just clear the incidents after SentinelOne has dealt with them. Every other tool I have used requires significantly more effort to maintain.

Their support is good and quick to respond. The one issue we faced was when a non-protection issue arose there was a lot of dancing around trying to figure things out. This was frustrating as it took significantly longer to figure out issues. Lots of repetitive log gathers, screen caps, uninstalls that never seemed to resolve issues. Eventually, the product would be updated and the issue seemed to be resolved, but seemed to be the only solution.

In the context of more than 2000 network devices, mostly Cisco equipment, more than 5000 users, and many sites, it was not difficult for us to make the decision to adopt Cisco SecureX. Without a doubt, it was the product that offered the best integration and gave us more information about the behavior of our network.

Webroot is a great product but did not provide the versatility that we really were desiring. It allowed to us to centrally manage, but required policy-based management, and not the endpoint detail we wanted. SentinelOne's central management provides a variety of options for us to deploy and manage.

• It helps us easily Id the full extent of a threat
• It saves time searching for data.
• It only gives basic info I wish there was greater integration between all security offerings
• It allows other techs to pick up where you left off.

• The product has reduced the time required fixing issues due to viruses, Phishing, and other attempts to cause my staff harm.