Snort vs. IBM Security QRadar SIEM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Snort
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Sourcefire developed Snort, an open source intrusion prevention system capable of real-time traffic analysis and packet logging. Snort was acquired (and is now supported) by Cisco in 2013.N/A
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Pricing
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Considered Both Products
Snort
Chose Snort
Snort was chosen mainly for the ease and cost. With Snort we was able to set up in a matter of minutes without any professional services needed. If you are used to packet tracing the old fashion way, this is the product for you.
Chose Snort
Sourcefire vs. TippingPoint was a no-brainer for us at the time of deployment. Sourcefire has a more well-defined API using REST that can be leveraged for automating tasks. TippingPoint was just releasing an API that was limited. Also at the time, TippingPoint could not meet …
Chose Snort
For our organization, the Cisco defense in depth concept works the best. While Cisco can be made to work with other vendors, we have found the best in depth protection by integrating Cisco products for maximum visibility. We had a Barracuda web filter, but it was difficult to …
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Due to its performance, it is a more practical way to analyze and respond to an incident. It is a graphic with good interaction and multiple integrated platforms.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I would always recommend Splunk over IBM Security QRadar SIEM unless you're trying to save money or only onboarding and normalizing well known data sources. IBM Security QRadar SIEM doesn't seem to handle RBA and complicated, chaining correlation rules very effectively and if I …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
We chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM not only because it was a leader but because it convinced us it was a solid product suitable for multiple scenarios but most importantly we needed a really secure and powerful software for our infrastructure.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Security QRadar SIEM has been quite a revolutionary siem solution compared to its counterparts. Be it the use case building to maintaining log source integrations, Qradar has proved to be one of the most efficient and easy to use solution. Having IBM SOAR along with the …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Because is easy to use and if you don't have analysts with database language skills IBM Security QRadar SIEM is easy to use in comparison to Splunk.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Because they are the best and most used tools in the Cyber ​​Security market for event correlation.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
It provides practicality by containing several domains in a single tenant and being able to subdivide them in a single place, in addition to the fact that the price is very competitive in the market.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
The QRadar licensing process is based on EPS (Events Per Second) and there are no limitations on event collection, regardless of the origin of the logs. This becomes an advantage as the price is agreed between the parties before purchase, so you have knowledge of what you can …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
We select a IBM Security QRadar SIEM because is better to integrate a our SIEM QRADAR.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I still don't have experience with other SIEM solutions.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
ArcSight is more difficult to understand and administer, and it looks more like a box for programming and needs a lot of high-level skills personnel. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is well suited for organization cybersecurity in large and medium organizations. IBM Security QRadar …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Qradar is on my top choice because I have hands-on experience on it. on qradar it is much easier to investigate in case of any incident happend.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Security QRadar SIEM offers a wide range of features and capabilities, such as behavioral analysis, event correlation and incident management, making it a robust and effective choice.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Rapid7 InsightIDR and Paladion
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
QRadar's open architecture is easy to integrate with a wide range of security tools and third-party applications, which are available at the IBM X-force library to enhance overall flexibility. Its powerful analytics and correlation capabilities provide advanced threat detection …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I would take below parameters to say IBM Security QRadar SIEM is better than other SIEM tools such as netwitness SIEM"

1) Easy to Use
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
I found that IBM Security QRadar SIEM has better threat detection methods and the identification of cyber kill chains followed by attackers. Analysis of the data gives visibility that other SIEM solutions need to improve. Integration in IBM Security QRadar SIEM is also better …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
User friendly and use case management portal which helps to get brief idea about security posture based on mitre mapping is best thing i have experienced in qradar.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
price, to be honest IBM Security QRadar SIEM package is very good for most customers than Splunk and Sentinel
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its …
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
It's in the middle of this chart, Splunk from my point of view it's still the best SIEM actually and Sentinel it's very easy to use.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
IBM Qradar is cheaper and also easy to use.
For splunk you need dedicated team of experts.
Chose IBM Security QRadar SIEM
As a part of core security service provider, we could not stand with the tools that are used as a generic data processor. The compliance, log reading and events are well managed in QRadar compared to other tools
Features
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Snort
-
Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.5
Ratings
8% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Small Businesses
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SnortIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
If a colleague was looking to tighten down their network I can easily recommend Snort to them. It gives you some more peace of mind knowing that its always scanning traffic for malicious looking code. Even things your major firewalls and security hardware might miss, Snort has picked up. Its an easy recommendation for me.
Read full review
QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review
Pros
  • The threat intelligence from Cisco TALOS is unparalleled. This is grafted into the Sourcefire application which greatly improves security visibility. With this there are a lot of groups that you can use for white listing or blacklisting, knowing its being updated in the background without additional work from you.
  • Flexible. Instead of putting a traditional firewall inline you can put a source fire appliance (or firewall with sourcefire on-board) to not only block/allow traffic, but if you insights into it, and do some forms of threat scoring.
  • In depth information. Sometimes a bit overwhelming, but you are able to do more than just see alerts, you can view the full information and packets that lead to the conclusion, though the conclusion is prepared in advance for you.
Read full review
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
Cons
  • There are plenty of false positives in the logs, but no problems noticed related to them.
Read full review
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As a grade I give 8 as QRadar is not easy to learn. It requires some time to master it. It also needs a team of people actively working on the product. Once you learn to use it the software works very well and it is easy to correlate and understand detected threats. It only takes time to learn how to use it well and configure it properly.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The training was very useful and the people who taught us were very knowledgeable. Although the software may initially seem difficult to learn they made things much easier for us.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Initial patience is required to learn how to use the product, and it takes a dedicated team to use it. One person is not enough, and it's not enough to just set it up and check it once in a while. It has to be used daily and kept under control to be used effectively
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Snort was chosen mainly for the ease and cost. With Snort we was able to set up in a matter of minutes without any professional services needed. If you are used to packet tracing the old fashion way, this is the product for you.
Read full review
I would always recommend Splunk over IBM Security QRadar SIEM unless you're trying to save money or only onboarding and normalizing well known data sources. IBM Security QRadar SIEM doesn't seem to handle RBA and complicated, chaining correlation rules very effectively and if I had to write a custom add-on for custom data, I found it easier to do so in Splunk.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The Sourcefire deployment has been very good at actively blocking threats that would have potentially caused loss or compromise.
  • It has given us great visibility to our network.
Read full review
  • Like any cybersecurity product, any money you don't lose on a prevented attack is money that you saved
  • Most of the apps are free and provides great enrichment like User Behaviour Analytics
  • Top quality alerts gives enormous value to the "passive" data that flows into the infrastructure
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Security QRadar SIEM Screenshots

Screenshot of QRadar SIEM Cloud native- Threat intelligence preview