Cisco TrustSec vs. IBM Security QRadar EDR
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco TrustSec | Score5 out of 10 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | |
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Armor Score6 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Trend Micro Deep Security Score8.3 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AWS CloudTrail Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.0 |
| Cisco TrustSec | IBM Security QRadar EDR | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |







