TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco TrustSec vs. Microsoft Entra Private Access

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco TrustSec

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Microsoft Entra Private Access

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Entra Private Access is the company's identity-centric Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution. Built on Zero Trust principles, it helps quickly and securely connect users to private apps—on-premises and across any cloud.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Cisco TrustSec and Microsoft Entra Private Access
    Feature
    Cisco TrustSec
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Entra Private Access
    9.5
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Cisco TrustSec and Microsoft Entra Private Access
    Feature
    Cisco TrustSec
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Entra Private Access
    9.0
    2 Ratings
    0% above category average
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Cisco TrustSec and Microsoft Entra Private Access
    Feature
    Cisco TrustSec
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Entra Private Access
    9.1
    2 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Zero Trust Security
    Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Cisco TrustSec and Microsoft Entra Private Access
    Feature
    Cisco TrustSec
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Entra Private Access
    8.9
    2 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Continuous Verification00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
    Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Network Flow Control00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Admin Access Control00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Network Data Encryption00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
    Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Forescout Vistaro Platform
    Score6.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Entra Private Access
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
    • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
    • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
    • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Well suited for employees working remotely who need access to internal applications without connecting to a traditional VPN.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
    • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Help and solutions if needed, support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Entra provides a convinient way to authorised user to access the internal applications securely.Provides the secure application gateway and protects the application from unauthorised users and user accessing from unfamilar location.Also there can be more improvement in initial configurations and troubleshooting can be somewhat complex to the users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    More reliable as azure framework is used within the orgs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Reduction in IT operational costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots