TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco TrustSec vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco TrustSec

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Microsoft Purview Information Protection

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Purview Information Protection (formerly Azure Information Protection) is a solution designed to enable users to better protect sensitive information. With it, users can control and secure email, documents, and sensitive data shared outside a company. From classification to embedded labels and permissions, users can enhance data protection at all times with Azure Information Protection—no matter where it’s stored or who it’s shared with.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Purview Information Protection
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Purview Information Protection
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Purview Information Protection
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Purview Information Protection
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco TrustSecMicrosoft Purview Information Protection
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
    • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
    • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
    • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I can see using this on prints that are highly confidential. But, for everyday files, it might be overkill
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
    • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Help and solutions if needed, support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Reduction in IT operational costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    ScreenShots