Cisco TrustSec vs. TeamDrive

• Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
• Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
• Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
• Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.

Incentivized

Nothing gets lost on TeamDrive since SYNQION offers both offline and online file sync. Data protection seal allows us to control who can access data on it.

Incentivized

• Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
• Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.

Incentivized

• Collaboration of teams on documents and files.
• Offers cloud and on-premise platforms on our company server.
• Enhances file synchronization even when offline.
• Allocates encrypted back-up copy in case of data loss.
• Offers 30 days free trial.

Incentivized

• Help and solutions if needed, support

Incentivized

• Were it not for the fact that everyone hasn't yet implemented TeamDrive in our organization - I totally have nothing in mind that need to be advanced.

Incentivized

Filestack support wasn't offering rapid responses to our tickets. For that reason, we decided to implement TeamDrive since they responded rapidly via phone call and allocated 30 days free trial that we enjoyed before upgrading.

Incentivized

• Reduction in IT operational costs

Incentivized

• Offline synchronization makes changes on files even when not connected to the internet.
• Collaboration of teams on documents improve productivity.
• Data governance through end-to-end encryption.

Incentivized