TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco TrustSec

    Score5 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Tempered Airwall

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ATempered Networks is network security technology from the company of the same name in Seattle, Washington.N/A
    Pricing
    Cisco TrustSecTempered Airwall
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco TrustSecTempered Airwall
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco TrustSecTempered Airwall
    Small Businesses
    Armor
    Score6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Trend Micro Deep Security
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE)
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    AWS CloudTrail
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Cisco IOS Security
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco TrustSecTempered Airwall
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco TrustSecTempered Airwall
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
    • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
    • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
    • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tempered
    It's very well suited for geographically dispersed organizations, where deploying and managing remote firewalls and other network security functions aren't practical. Once deployed, and the deployment isn't difficult after planning and understanding the data flows of the IoT devices, the system is easily managed and flexible. You're able to allow front line operations people to add devices into a role without sacrificing the integrity of the security model.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
    • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tempered
    • Low capital and support cost structures.
    • Ease of deployment.
    • Ability to work over the existing network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Help and solutions if needed, support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tempered
    • Integration with third-party security controls.
    • Automating the on-boarding of devices.
    • Reporting needs to be more detailed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Tempered
    It's pretty darned good for a new company. We had to hash through a couple of instances that no one had ever run into, but once we got to the right person on the engineering team, they were able to work through the solution pretty quickly. The nice thing is, unlike Cisco, once you fix something, you don't find three new things that have to be changed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Tempered
    The cost and complexity vs. ISE is as different as Uber and Lift are from trying to take a taxi in Duluth, Minnesota. The complexity of Cisco's IoT security is a joke. It was going to take us over a year just to deploy all the Cisco equipment, and that was if we could have gotten it all working together. We got the entire project deployed in just under 3 months, and that includes working out all the bugs and logistics. Honestly, I don't think all the Cisco parts would have ever been running like Cisco promised it would. It's just way too complicated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • Reduction in IT operational costs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tempered
    • Capital cost to deploy was 1/4 the cost of doing Cisco.
    • People and time frame to do the entire deployment was 1/12th the time/people to complete the installation.
    • On-going management is being done without adding staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots