Cisco UCS Manager vs. Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco UCS Manager supports the entire Cisco UCS server and Cisco HyperFlex Series hyperconverged infrastructure portfolios. It enables server, fabric, and storage provisioning as well as, device discovery, inventory, configuration, diagnostics, monitoring, fault detection, auditing, and statistics collection.N/A
Veritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
NetBackup IT Analytics, from Veritas, delivers unified backup and storage insights for heterogeneous IT environments across on-prem and cloud services. It helps users to gain actionable insights through a single-pane of glass for enterprise data wherever it resides. It is based on the former Aptare product, acquired by Veritas in 2019.N/A
Pricing
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Best Alternatives
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Small Businesses
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS Storage Gateway
AWS Storage Gateway
Score 8.4 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor (SRM)
SolarWinds Storage Resource Monitor (SRM)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(23 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco UCS ManagerVeritas NetBackup IT Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It [Cisco UCS Manager] is extremely well suited to large virtual infrastructure environments with resource dense blades. This solution is also great if you want to consolidate a large number of servers (if they are servers that need to stay physical, but can fit in the profile of a blade) - this would reduce data center space utilization as well as power and cooling. Cisco UCS Manager is also great if you're looking for centralized management of a larger number of servers. This would not be a great solution if you have a very small shop - it's not cheap and probably wouldn't give you a ROI if you only have a couple dozen servers total. I'd say it would be overkill for small shops, but if you have the money and don't care, you'll still like it.
Read full review
Cohesity
I would like to recommend it for its detailed reporting feature, which is - I should say the great feature of Veritas Netbackup IT Analytics and they succeeded to deliver that if we compare it with ManageEngine Recovery Plus or Veeam etc. Apart from that, its Ransomware resilience has proved to the world how clients got benefitted from it and how easily they managed to recover the infected data.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • It is very all inclusive for management of every part our our Cisco blade center.
  • It allows us to directly connect to a hardware-based server in the blade center as though we were physically at the console.
  • It allows us to monitor the entire system for faults.
  • It lets us manage connectivity.
  • It is set to alert us via email if a fault occurs.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • Optimization of Storage backup.
  • In-depth expenditure reports, even at department level as well.
  • Compatibility with offline(On-premises)/On-line(Cloud Data).
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Automation: There is a simple power-shell CMD lets, but it leaves more to be desired.
  • Navigation: Navigating the interface can be confusing.
  • Integration: Integration with ESXi hosts while doing FW upgrades would be hugely beneficial without the need for additional tools.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • Not easy to implement and need more resources to manage.
  • Technical support to be improved for this, which is lagging somewhere.
  • It's really very expensive.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
Cisco UCS Manager allows for integrated management of all UCS components, streamlining processes like server provisioning, networking, and storage configuration
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
The automation capabilities of Cisco UCS Manager help streamline tasks such as provisioning, configuration, and monitoring, leading to increased efficiency
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
Cisco UCSM Support has been very quick to reply and address our concerns, issues, and questions. We have found that Cisco's documentation is clear and concise and fairly easy to find. With Cisco support's help, we are able to quickly and safely meet the demands of our end-users, consistently.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
I think UCS Manager would be able very comparable to other vendors offerings when it comes to server configuration. I think Cisco did a good job in giving you full access to many options that you might not see with Dell or HPE. Every manufacturer would need a similar tool to control their server environment, but I think what Cisco has built into their Manager is a little better than others I've used. You can just see and change so many settings. I would say that is also a bit of a negative by a little bit because sometimes it is hard to dig in and find what you need to change and often might need to reach out to TAC or take a training course to understand all of the interface.
Read full review
Cohesity
It was number one due to its reporting feature, whereas it's not easy to implement but keeping in view it's reporting & cross-cloud platform functionality also this is a great option for all. Using it on a daily basis will make your life easier but doubt we need a little more resources to manage it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • The positive is I was able to consolidate my small server infrastructure from 3 racks to one rack giving me space back and much power savings
  • The negative would be it could feel a little daunting to manage as there are many tabs and pieces to the interface.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • Reduced clintel due to high costing.
  • Impacted support due to delay.
  • Streamline the backups and Audit procedure.
Read full review
ScreenShots