Cisco Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus

Cities where there are historical places that can't be destroyed by civil works. CURWB can help to deploy fast communication without fiber.

Incentivized

Analytics, Threat Hunting and detailed investigations for the security incidents are the main use cases. Automation on the cloud based on the feeds through the minemeld is another use case. When you deploy PAN on perimeter, Autofocus gives you a temendaous value. If you have non PAN firewall/products running Auto focus doe not make sense.

Incentivized

• It has a very low delay compared to other Wireless Technologies for p2p communications.
• It is reliable even when it works within a band already used for other technologies.
• It is secure, the communications is encrypted.

Incentivized

• Threat intelligence
• Emerging Threats
• Intelligence feeds

Incentivized

• It could have a dashboard for monitoring performance of the communication.
• The dashboard is simple to use but it can be improve on the UX/UI.

Incentivized

• third party product integration
• simplicity of the managment console
• integration to cortex agents directly

Incentivized

Since Cisco acquired Fluidmesh, they are deploying new and better features that can be very useful.

Incentivized

If you have Palo Alto, autofocus is the selected choice. If you have Checkpoint than the threat cloud. Price of autofocus is much cheaper. Unit42 is the real differentiator. Minemeld is unique to PAN and working perfectly. Search outputs and are detailed and gives lots of data. Integration with SOAR is much easier with autofocus. Indicator list is huge. Tagging works magnificent.

Incentivized

• Most of the clients are public.
• There is a breach on private sector in our country.

Incentivized

• Cheap for us
• Easy integration
• Easy management

Incentivized