Cisco Vulnerability Management vs. FortiCNAPP
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM by Kenna Security, which was acquired by Cisco in June of 2021), is a vulnerability management platform featuring real-time cyber-risk analysis and predictive modeling based on intelligence feeds and global attack telemetries to provide accurate, reliable risk prioritization and protection. | N/A |
FortiCNAPP | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | FortiCNAPP is an enterprise Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms solution that unifies security posture management, developer code scanning, cloud identity governance, and runtime threat detection into a single management console. FortiCNAPP represents the evolution of Fortinet's cloud security portfolio following its acquisition of Lacework in August 2024. Formerly marketed as Lacework FortiCNAPP, the platform incorporates Lacework's foundational polygraph behavioral analysis engine… | N/A |
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 7 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threat Intelligence |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vulnerability Management Tools |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Tenable Nessus Score8.8 out of 10 | Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tenable Vulnerability Management Score8.9 out of 10 | Microsoft Defender for Cloud Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 7.1 |
| Usability | 10.0 | - |
| Cisco Vulnerability Management | FortiCNAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |

