Cisco Vulnerability Management vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Cisco Vulnerability Management vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Vulnerability Management | N/A | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM by Kenna Security, which was acquired by Cisco in June of 2021), is a vulnerability management platform featuring real-time cyber-risk analysis and predictive modeling based on intelligence feeds and global attack telemetries to provide accurate, reliable risk prioritization and protection. | N/A | |
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | N/A | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions. | N/A |
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Intelligence |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vulnerability Management Tools |
|
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 8.7 out of 10 | ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes Score 8.7 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 | CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 |
Enterprises | CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 | CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.1 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 8.7 (15 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (1 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Availability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Performance | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (5 ratings) |
In-Person Training | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Professional Services | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Cisco Vulnerability Management | Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Pros | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Cons | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Likelihood to Renew | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Usability | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Reliability and Availability | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Performance | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Support Rating | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Alternatives Considered | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Contract Terms and Pricing Model | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Scalability | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
Return on Investment | Cisco No answers on this topic | Trellix (FireEye + McAfee) |
ScreenShots |