Claravine vs. Informatica Cloud Data Governance, Access and Privacy

Using Claravine for campaign tracking code generation, its perfectly suited to easily and scalable manage data.

Incentivized

The Informatics vision is already determined and with the relationships already configured, or that plasters any new type of vision or relationship between the Assets. As a result, a pedigree diagram is poor and limited with the availability of information on the screen or in reports for consultation and decision making. It has an approval and maintenance workflow that is also limited to assets already made available only by Informática. It will not be possible to see the connection of a technical, functional, and documentary line in a single flow. It allows the registration of all data referring to a DPIA and LIA, but it does not generate a report that allows the aggregation of this set of information in a single place. The tool makes information available to support a decision regarding the DPIA and LIA, but it does not make it available in a unified way as in a report.

Incentivized

• automated sensitive field detection
• replace critical data with dummy but real-looking data
• threat detection
• role based access

Incentivized

• High Complexity, requires training.
• As it does not allow customization in relationships such as information separately in visual form and even in other tools of the Informatics group such as EDC.
• Navigation is complex.

Incentivized

As Claravine Admin, i find using the platform very easy to manage. Adding new data fields and values to existing data sets is very easy. Integrating with other platforms is very straightfoward

Incentivized

Overall experience with Axon is average and it is a very manual product. Axon is a very good tool for data governance. User-friendly interface and is integrated with multiple systems.

Incentivized

• risk mitigation
• data loss prevention
• role based data access

Incentivized