Overall Satisfaction with Informatica Axon Data Governance (formerly Diaku)
We needed to help a large bank in Brazil select Axon Data Governance and privacy management tool, but the main focus was on data governance and data discovery amid more than 800 different databases within that database, the tool was able to connect with 90% of these databases quickly and cost-effectively aligned with the tool support were important points for implementation, remember that it was not the best tool to manage privacy.
- Data Catalog
- Integration with Different Databases.
- Relationship between data and trading rules and trading terms.
- High Complexity, requires training.
- As it does not allow customization in relationships such as information separately in visual form and even in other tools of the Informatics group such as EDC.
- Navigation is complex.
- Data profile
- Treatment marking and which legal basis is linked to each data.
- Creating dashboards on data assets and metadata.
- Business Process mapping.
- Data discovery
- Negative impact: high training demand
- Negative impact: high cost of infrastructure
- Negative impact: does not meet privacy management
- Positive impact: very good support
- Positive impact: rapid implementation
- Positive impact: very good data discovery quality
It was not the best-evaluated tool in technical terms, the best evaluation is with Collibra, but the support and price offered surpassed Collibra, which is not supported in Brazil, so the choice of Informatica was more due to the support and price of the than for tool quality. It ends up meeting the basics of governance, but it's not good for privacy management.
Do you think Informatica Cloud Data Governance delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Informatica Cloud Data Governance's feature set?
Yes
Did Informatica Cloud Data Governance live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Informatica Cloud Data Governance go as expected?
No
Would you buy Informatica Cloud Data Governance again?
No