Claris FileMaker vs. React Native

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Claris FileMaker
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Claris' FileMaker is presented as a Workplace Innovation Platform, and is used to create a custom app. Manual processes can be automated with Claris FileMaker Pro, and apps can be created to manage contacts, track inventory, organize projects, etc.
$21
per month per user
React Native
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
React Native is a framework for building native applications using React. It is open source and free, and developed by Meta Platforms. It enables users to create native apps for Android and iOS using React. React Native combines native development with React, a JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
$0
Pricing
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Editions & Modules
Platform Subscription
$21
per month per user
Individual desktop license
$594
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Features
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Claris FileMaker
8.1
4 Ratings
4% below category average
React Native
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.14 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces4.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.1 out of 10
React (React.js)
React (React.js)
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(51 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Claris FileMakerReact Native
Likelihood to Recommend
Claris
If your company is really small, I can understand the need for a product like this. However, I would go for MS Access... FileMaker Pro can not be integrated with other systems (like MS Access can at least be handled by C# for instance, and can be integrated with MS Excel or even SQL server). I'm really not sure in what scenario one would choose for FileMaker Pro. If your application or company grows bigger, you're going to have a problem to move to another environment. Also, the fact that only one person can work with the backend at any given time is a problem in a somewhat larger company.
Read full review
Open Source
We are implementing React Native framework for the development of the Front-End for the machine learning models maintenance and monitoring website. It provides meaningful error messages, and time-saving and robust tools make it a premium choice over other platforms. Moreover, it provides intelligent debugging tools and error report mechanisms. And most importantly for us, it provides the aesthetic minimal functionality to learn in order to implement it, thereby eliminating the need to work in Xcode or Android Studio for iOS or Android apps respectively.
Read full review
Pros
Claris
  • The relational database management system makes the program highly customizable to fit the needs of any product. You can add a ton of information to each record and update your inventory on a regular basis with an Excel import or manually inside of the record. It has the capability to incorporate barcoding, which can manage your available inventory with ease.
  • The scripting language allows FileMaker to automatically calculate complex algorithms automatically or generate report outs with the click of a button. This allows for greater UI, especially with active users who are not familiar with writing code. Almost all of our internal data is linked to the FileMaker database
  • The server license allows many users to update the database in real time, which is handy if your inventory is constantly changing. We have users with Macs, PCs, iPhones and handheld tablets linked to our FileMaker database and they are updating the information constantly throughout the day.
  • If you invest some time into formatting and scripting the database, there is a high ease of use for users without knowledge of any programming or FileMaker itself.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Customized Components
  • State Management
  • Extensibility
  • Usage and Community
Read full review
Cons
Claris
  • Developer features need to be beefed up - namely adding the ability to search code for a phrase or keyword and the ability to do the same in the "relationship graph" in the database.
  • Add ability for users to edit the same table record at the same time by version control.
  • Allow Filemaker Server to use more than 1 core; currently multi-processing is not supported and it can be tricky to find just the right server to support the application you've built to the fullest capacity.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Performance is still lower than native app development (Kotlin, Swift, etc.)
  • Not efficient design-wise (if you are planning to implement some advanced design, then you should reconsider the approach provided by React Native)
  • Issues with the update to the last release of React Native
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Claris
It it not really up to me but my opinion does have some weight in the decision and the reason I would renew my use FileMaker Pro 8.5 is because I am finally getting used to it! Now that I have been working with the program, tasks have become quicker and projects are getting done faster. File Maker Pro 8.5 really is a versatile tool and I think we are just scratching the surface with it's abilities.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Usability
Claris
It's almost what it should be after so may years and with Apple's longevity and strength behind it. For people who earn their living based on efficiency I think there are too many developer obstacles that waste time and therefore money.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Claris
mostly never issues and if there are they are resolved fast
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Performance
Claris
for the most part but lots of error messages if you type something h correctly
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Claris
The forums are great with lots of helpful experts and the staff monitor them to provide help where needed. There have been a couple of unique technical issues I've had to deal with that I haven't been able to get resolved so I chose to score this a 9 instead of a 10.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Claris
easy to follow along and was able to jump in right away
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Claris
Suggest you use an iterative R.A.D. or AGILE development approach. (i.e. rather than writing a gigantic spec for a system, then building it). FileMaker facilitates quick prototypes. Developing an example, then allowing users to "try it out" is a snap.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Claris
FileMaker is still the quickest way to go from zero to having a minimum viable working solution. Simple solutions can be built in as little as a afternoon of development. It is the only tool I am aware of which allows tech savy end users with domain knowledge to build bespoke apps for their businesses without undertaking professional software development training.
Read full review
Open Source
Decision for React Native came mainly from the big popularity of the framework. Thus, we had a big base of resources we could come back to. We also used it because it is a javascript framework. Thus, we could utilize the already existing experience in javascript and web development to ensure a smoother implementation of the app.
Read full review
Scalability
Claris
it's most definitely does as we are a unique business to use this for scholarship awarding
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Claris
  • We are a more agile company because of FileMaker. A few of us who are tech-savvy enough to manage the database (but are not professional developers) can make needed adjustments to our database without having to employ an in-house developer or contract with a 3rd party. As our business processes evolve and change, it's easy to update the database to accommodate those changes.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Decreased the development process time via robust and easy-to-use platform
  • Easier to debug with a provided intelligent tool as well as error-prone messages, which allows developing in a paced manner for the decreased Time-To-Market
  • Reusable code base can directly impact lead time and thereby on ROI in a positive manner
Read full review
ScreenShots