CloudBolt vs. gridscale

Creates dynamic groups and flexible Active Directory configurations. Improves our automation capabilities. Helps us to automate a part of our Active Directory administration process. Helps us to automate the process of registration and cleaning the computer accounts with Active Directory. Helps us to improve the reliability of registration to mitigate failures like retry logic and post validation checks.

Incentivized

• Create configuration with Microsoft endpoints.
• Support complex globally distributed multi-domains.
• Create and remove dynamic OU.
• Allows for static text in combination with dynamic content.

Incentivized

• Support could be improved on a >tier 1 level
• Logging could be more descriptive/specific
• Stability of the actual server

Incentivized

We honestly haven't looked into much. We've been using CloudBolt [Software] for a long, long time. I think we briefly looked into Morpheus but figured it was too much effort to lift everything, communicate it, etc. We selected CloudBolt [Software] because, at the time (and still do), they served our very specific case. We also liked the ability to customize certain aspects of the deployments - that enabled our "power users" to really tweak things just right for their departmental tasks.

Incentivized

• We have invested countless man hours to troubleshooting and being support's QA.
• Most of our teams have saved an invaluable amount of time by being able to automate their deployments.
• After the initial time you spend [understanding] all the nuances, the configuring of groups, permissions, etc., does make administering it easier.

Incentivized